Tuesday, April 1, 2014

IRS Targets Americans Living In Israel!


According to The Jewish Daily Forward, this upcoming tax season could entail some unpleasant surprises for United States citizens who either live in Israel or who hold bank accounts there.
Filing requirements for these Americans have become more rigorous and the odds of being audited by the Internal Revenue Service are higher than they’ve ever been. In fact, tax accountants working in Israel estimate that almost every American expatriate living in Israel and filing for a child tax credit in their annual return can expect an audit.

“I’ve seen more audits in the past year or two than I’ve seen in the previous 30 years combined,” said Philip Stein, an American CPA working in Israel. “It created a difficult atmosphere both for honest tax preparers and for honest families filing their returns.”

As the IRS cracks down on offshore accounts and on suspected fraud from overseas, Israel faces extra scrutiny. Part of it has to do with the federal government’s new campaign to uproot the practice of secret overseas bank accounts, some of which are in Israel. But part of the heightened scrutiny is a result of specific fraudulent activity carried out by Americans living in Israel that has effectively made the entire community a target of suspicion.

The $1,000 child tax credit for each child, enabled families who do not owe taxes to receive the cash value of the tax credit under certain conditions. Overseas U.S. citizens who pay taxes in their country of residence can qualify for the cash credit if they can demonstrate the taxes that they are paying overseas meets the threshold the IRS requires for tax filers living in America

The prospect of receiving a handsome yearly check from Uncle Sam prompted many of the estimated 250,000 United States citizens living in Israel to add a tax credit request for their children to their annual tax return. But alongside these legitimate claims, several self-proclaimed tax preparers in Israel offered American citizens who did not qualify for the credit a chance to claim it. Through ads in community newspapers — many of them Orthodox — and via word of mouth, they promised families that they could qualify even if they did not make enough earned income to qualify for the benefit.

For these families, some with eight or 10 children under the age of 17 and with very little income from work, the preparers helped submit fraudulent returns, stating false income from work in Israel. In other cases, they requested credit for children who were not recognized as United States citizens.
As the claims mounted, suspicion grew at the IRS, which eventually set up an “Israel project” for dealing with suspected tax returns from Israel, said Charles Ruchelman, a former government tax lawyer who now represents clients in tax controversies and litigation. “When they identify a trend, they start a project, and that’s what happened here,” he said. Eventually, almost all tax returns from Americans living in Israel that included a request for child tax credit were put under extra scrutiny and many have been audited.

“I never thought it would happen to me. Last week I received a letter from the IRS stating that I owed tens of thousands of dollars in taxes and penalties,” wrote a Haredi blogger after receiving the IRS envelope containing the audit announcement.

One Jerusalem resident told the Forward that her family spent months gathering the documents needed for the audit, which eventually found no wrongdoing in the family’s tax returns. “They wanted to see every pay stub and every document,” said the mother of four, who asked not to be identified due to concern that it would negatively impact her tax case.

Besides such income data, the IRS has demanded that families in Israel supply birth certificates, passports and detailed listings of their travel in and out of Israel to determine their eligibility for the child tax credit. In addition, the IRS requires Israelis to have all documents translated by a professional translator, a demand that is not imposed on other countries and results in hefty translation bills for those being audited. “These are abusive audits,” argued Adlerstein.

While audits have been ramped up, no criminal charges have been filed against any of the fraudulent tax preparers working in Israel. .

“The IRS has decided not to believe anything coming out of Israel and now it has in place this massive audit program that is creating great hardship for families, especially young families with children,” said Stein.

The IRS did not respond to questions from the Forward regarding its audit policy of tax filers living in Israel.

While these audits impact only Americans living in Israel, any other American citizen holding a bank account in Israel could also face much more scrutiny than in the past for an entirely different reason: the IRS’s new focus on offshore accounts.

This focus has led to an increase in the enforcement of the requirement that Americans and American residents file a Foreign Bank Account Report on every account held abroad that is worth more than $10,000. “They have become more aggressive, they are less forgiving, but they are not targeting [specifically] Israel,” said Ruchelman.

Initially, the IRS went after Swiss banks, which for years were synonymous with secrecy. Eventually, the U.S. Department of Justice succeeded in getting most foreign financial institutions to report on accounts belonging to United States citizens. Lack of compliance, banks were warned, would limit their ability to do business in America.

Israeli banks, under the same threat, also increased their efforts to identify clients who are United States citizens and report them to the IRS. A series of prosecutions against American citizens trying to avoid reporting their accounts in Israel and against tax preparers who advised their clients to use Israel as a tax shelter helped drive home the point.

The penalties for not reporting overseas accounts are hefty. But this has had the unintended effect of deterring, rather than encouraging, many from filling in the FBAR forms, for fear they will be taxed and penalized retroactively. The IRS now allows account holders to join a partial amnesty plan that will allow them to report their accounts and face only minimal penalties.

A recent report issued by the Government Accountability Office found that 4% of the accounts reported worldwide through this program were in Israel, making it the fifth most likely destination for overseas bank accounts.

Increased FBAR enforcement has impacted a wide circle of Americans, mainly Jewish, with ties to Israel. It includes not only those who have immigrated to Israel, or made aliyah, as adults, but also children of American citizens who are citizens themselves but may have never even visited the United States. The law is also relevant to any American who has opened an account in Israel in the past for use during visits to Israel or to help manage rental income in Israel.

Lawyers and accountants working with dual American–Israeli citizens report an increase in the number of clients seeking to close their accounts in Israel in order to avoid dealing with the FBAR law. Some have also met Israelis who are considering giving up their American citizenship for the same reasons.

Are You an American Living in Israel?

Are You an American With an Undeclared Israeli Account?

Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.

 for a FREE Tax Consultation at:   
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid ((888) 882-9243)






Monday, March 31, 2014

Caterpillar Saved Billions in US Tax By Shifting Profits to a Swiss Subsidiary



Caterpillar Inc., an American manufacturing icon, used a wholly owned Swiss affiliate to shift $8 billion in profits from the United States to Switzerland to take advantage of a special 4 to 6 percent corporate tax rate it negotiated with the Swiss government and defer or avoid paying $2.4 billion in U.S. taxes to date, a new report from Sen. Carl Levin, the chairman of the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations shows.


“Caterpillar is an American success story that produces phenomenal industrial machines, but it is also a member of the corporate profit-shifting club that has shifted billions of dollars in profits offshore to avoid paying U.S. taxes,” Levin said. “Caterpillar paid over $55 million for a Swiss tax strategy that has so far enabled it to avoid paying $2.4 billion in U.S. taxes. That tax strategy depends on the company making the case that its parts business is run out of Switzerland instead of the U.S. so it can justify sending 85 percent or more of the parts profits to Geneva. Well, I’m not buying that story.”


Caterpillar’s offshore tax strategy will be the subject of a Tuesday hearing, the latest in a series of subcommittee probes into tax avoidance by multinational corporations. Previous hearings examined offshore tax avoidance by Apple, Microsoft, and Hewlett-Packard, among others.


Starting in 1999, Caterpillar paid PricewaterhouseCoopers, acting as both its tax consultant and auditor, over $55 million to develop and implement a tax strategy built around redirecting to Switzerland taxable profits from sales of Caterpillar branded replacement parts manufactured by third parties under contract with the company.


Under the Swiss tax strategy, in exchange for a small royalty, Caterpillar transferred rights to the profits from its profitable international parts distribution business to a wholly controlled Swiss affiliate called CSARL. Caterpillar essentially redirected the profits by simply replacing its name with CSARL on its invoices. No personnel or business activities were moved from the United States to Switzerland, and most of the parts business remains in the US.


Prior to issuing the license, Caterpillar had booked 85 percent or more of its non-U.S. parts profits in the United States, where 70 percent of those parts are made and warehoused and where its global parts operation was created and is managed. The license allowed CSARL to sell the parts to Caterpillar’s non-U.S. dealers and pay Caterpillar a royalty equal to only about 15 percent of the parts profits, while keeping the remaining 85 percent on its books in Switzerland. From 2000 to 2012, Caterpillar directed so much of its parts profits to CSARL in Switzerland that it avoided paying U.S. taxes totaling $2.4 billion on parts profits of $8 billion.


“Caterpillar gave its Swiss sub $1 dollar of profits in exchange for 15 cents, a deal no reasonable business would offer,” Levin said. “It didn’t even ask to be compensated for turning over a profitable parts business that Caterpillar took decades to develop. It wasn’t a real business transaction; it was a tax deal pure and simple to shift profits between related parties.”


Caterpillar sent the vast majority of its profits to Switzerland even though only about 65 of the 8,300 Caterpillar employees who handle parts work in Switzerland. That contrasts with the nearly 5,000 U.S. employees who handle parts. None of the manufacturing, warehousing, or distribution activities – the heart of the parts business – exists in Switzerland. Because it lacks the personnel, infrastructure, and expertise to run the company’s parts business, CSARL pays Caterpillar to keep doing the work, reimbursing it for its costs plus a small service fee.


Caterpillar told the subcommittee that sending the lion’s share of the parts profits to Switzerland is justified because its Swiss affiliate performs valuable intangible services. But the report points out that a company executive, under oath, acknowledged that there was no business advantage to the Swiss arrangement other than tax avoidance. The report also shows how Caterpillar, when evaluating the same type of intangible services at another time, found their value to be negligible.


“When Caterpillar and its tax advisers launched this tax avoidance scheme, almost nothing changed in the real world,” Levin said. “The manufacturing workers who make world-class parts, the managers who operate its parts operations, the warehouses where they are stored – none of that changed. But in the fantasy land that is international tax law, tax lawyers waved a magic wand to make millions of dollars in U.S. taxes disappear.”


This type of profit shifting costs the government between $30 billion and $90 billion a year, according to academic estimates cited in a 2013 Congressional Research Service report. The tax practice has become a focus for the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and the Group of 20 nations, who are trying to develop coordinated rules that could be adopted by multiple governments.


The largest U.S. companies have accumulated $1.95 trillion in profits outside the country that haven’t been taxed by the U.S., according to data compiled by Bloomberg News.


Caterpillar has $17 billion, up from $11 billion three years earlier,
according to company securities filings.


Levin’s investigation began focusing on Caterpillar following a lawsuit filed by former employee Daniel Schlicksup, who alleged that company executives retaliated against him when he raised concerns about the international tax strategies.


The report makes the point that offshore profit-shifting by U.S. corporations goes beyond the intellectual property maneuvers of technology companies such as Apple Inc. and Microsoft Corp. that have been the subjects of past hearings by Levin.


Tuesday’s hearing is at 9:30 a.m. in Room 106 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building. It will include testimony from independent tax experts and executives from Caterpillar & PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Full details are available on the subcommittee’s website, where the hearing will be streamed live.

Need Tax Advice That Will Survive Scrutiny?


Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.

 for a FREE Tax Consultation at:   
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid ((888) 882-9243(888) 882-9243)



Sources:


Senate


Bloomberg

IRS Released Revised Form W-8BEN-E For Entities.



On Friday, March 14, 2014, we posted "IRS Revised FormW-8BEN For Individuals - What Form Do You Use For Entities?" Where we discussed that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) had released revised IRS Form W-8BEN (Certificate of Foreign Status of Beneficial Owner for United States Tax Withholding (Individuals)).


The IRS Instructions for Form W-8BEN provided that Form W-8BEN IRS Form W-8BEN is now used exclusively by individuals and Entities should use IRS Form W-8BEN-E which was still in draft form.



We advised that taxpayers should use the old W-8BEN for entities, until the new one (coming out soon) for entities, W'8BEN-E comes out. Well the new Form W-8BEN-E has now been released.


The IRS released on March 29 the final version of the 2014 Form W-8BEN-E, a form required under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act.

Form Form W-8BEN-E, Certificate of Status of Beneficial Owner for United States Tax Withholding and Reporting (Entities) is available at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/fw8bene.pdf.

Have an IRS Problem?


Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.

 for a FREE Tax Consultation at:   
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid ( 888 882-9243)








Monday, March 17, 2014

Are You A Credit Suisse Client? You May Want to Make Your Voluntary Disclosure NOW!



We previously posted on Monday, March 10, 2014, U.S.Client of Credit Suisse? Last Chance To File A Voluntary Disclosure! where we discussed that Thousands of Credit Suisse Group AG’s U.S. clients still don’t know whether tax authorities will learn their identities as prosecutors work to conclude a three year probe of how the bank helped them evade taxes.

The Swiss disclosure program will lead to 106 banks’ producing information short of client names. We posted on January 28, 2014, Offshore Swiss Bank Account? This May Be Your Last Chance To File A Voluntary Disclosure! where we discussed that the United States Justice Department has received 106 requests from Swiss entities to participate in a US settlement program.

That post also discussed that Credit Suisse, Switzerland's second largest bank, is close to reaching its own settlement with the US DOJ. Credit Suisse is one of the 13 banks excluded from the US DOJ amnesty because it was already being investigated when he program was announced, but it is still free to negotiate its own non-prosecution deal.

Credit Suisse will have to disclose a great deal of information about its American clients, even including some of their names. 


Now the US Government made the announced on Wednesday, March 12, 2014, that a former Credit Suisse Banker, Andreas Bachmann, pleaded guilty to conspiring to defraud the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in connection with his work as a banking and investment adviser for U.S. customers.

Mr. Bachmann is 56 years old and a Swiss citizen. He and 6 other Credit Suisse bankers were indicted in 2011 on a charge that they helped U.S. clients hide $4 billion in assets from the IRS. 

This “plea is just the latest step in our wide-ranging investigations into Swiss banking activities and demonstrates the Department of Justice's commitment to global enforcement against those that facilitate offshore tax evasion,” said Deputy Attorney General Cole.  “We fully expect additional developments over the course of the coming months.”

Bachmann was charged in a one-count superseding indictment on July 21, 2011, and faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison when he is sentenced on Aug. 8, 2014.

You have to wonder how many US Clients and other Swiss Bankers & Advisers he blew the whistle on, in order to come up with such a lenient charge?

In a statement of facts filed with the plea agreement, Bachmann admitted that between 1994 and 2006, while working as a relationship manager in Switzerland for a subsidiary of an international bank, he engaged in a wide-ranging conspiracy to aid and assist U.S. customers in evading their income taxes by concealing assets and income in secret Swiss bank accounts.

As part of that conspiracy, Bachmann traveled to the United States twice each year to provide banking services and investment advice to his U.S. customers.  As a matter of practice, prior to traveling to the United States, Bachmann notified his executive management, including the head of the subsidiary’s private bank in Zurich and the chief executive officer of the subsidiary, of the planned trip and its objectives.

Although Bachmann had been informed of limitations under U.S. law on his ability to provide investment advice to U.S. account holders regarding U.S. securities, the highest ranking executive at the subsidiary was aware that Bachmann was violating U.S. law.  According to the statement of facts, Bachmann was effectively told by the chief executive officer for the subsidiary, “Mr. Bachmann, you know what we expect of you, don’t get caught.”

According to the statement of facts, Bachmann also engaged in cash transactions while traveling in the United States.  In the course of arranging meetings with U.S. customers, some clients would request that Bachmann either provide them with cash as withdrawals from their undeclared accounts or take cash from them as a deposit to their undeclared accounts.  As part of that process, Bachmann agreed to receive cash from U.S. customers and used that cash to pay withdrawals to other U.S. clients.  In one instance, Bachmann received $50,000 in cash from one U.S. customer in New York City and intended to deliver the money to another U.S. client in Southern Florida.  Airport officials in New York discovered the cash but let Bachmann keep the money after questioning him.  The client in Florida refused to take the money after the client learned about the questioning by New York airport officials, and Bachmann returned to Switzerland with the $50,000 in cash in his checked baggage.  Bachmann advised the executive management of the subsidiary about the incident with the cash.

Bachmann also understood that a number of his U.S. customers concealed their ownership and control of foreign financial accounts by holding those accounts in the names of nominee tax haven entities, or structures, which were frequently created in the form of foreign partnerships, trusts, corporations or foundations.

Bachmann dealt with Josef DÓ§rig, a co-defendant, regarding the formation and/or maintenance of structures for U.S. customers, among others.  In approximately 1997, the international bank instructed DÓ§rig to form his own company specializing in the formation and management of nominee tax haven entities because it was “too risky” to have Dörig perform that work from inside the international bank.  The international bank then directed the subsidiary and others to use DÓ§rig and his Swiss trust company, DÓ§rig Partner AG, as the preferred choice for the formation and management of structures.

US taxpayers who have undeclared accounts in Credit Suisse or other Swiss banks, may now want to consider applying for the US Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP), which sets a limit to the penalties imposed on them by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for failing to declare foreign assets and earnings.
 
Once either:
  • The Swiss Banks disclose an account holder's name to the IRS under the non prosecution agreement or 
  • Mr. Andreas Bachmann discloses an account holder's name to the IRS or
  • Any 1 of the 6 other Credit Suisse Bankers, who were indicted in 2011 along with Mr. Bachmannn, discloses an account holder's name to the IRS 
the OVDP election is no longer available to that account holder!!!
 
Taxpayers Who Wish To Take Advantage 
Of The OVDP Must Act Quickly! 



Have Un-Reported Income From a Swiss Bank?

Value Your Freedom?


Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
  
for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).





Source:


DOJ


Bloomberg 

Friday, March 14, 2014

IRS Revised W-8BEN For Individuals - What Form Do You Use For Entities?


The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has released revised IRS Form W-8BEN (Certificate of Foreign Status of Beneficial Owner for United States Tax Withholding (Individuals)). The IRS has also released revised IRS Instructions for Form W-8BEN .
Generally, certain foreign persons are required to provide IRS Form W-8BEN to their withholding agents or payors with regard to certain income payments, including fixed or determinable annual or periodical income (FDAP income) from US sources, in order to:

  • establish that such persons are not US persons;
  • claim that they are the beneficial owners of the payments; and
  • claim income tax treaty benefits, if applicable, for the purpose of chapter 3 of the US Internal Revenue Code (IRC).
  • The revised IRS Form W-8BEN modifies, Line 8 to request the date of birth for a beneficial owner who holds a financial account with a US office of a financial institution.
IRS Form W-8BEN has been updated to reflect the documentation requirements of IRC chapter 4, i.e. the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).

  • IRS Form W-8BEN is now used exclusively by individuals.
  • Entities should use IRS Form W-8BEN-E, however,
  • the new W-8BEN-E is still in draft form.

We believe that you use the old W-8BEN for entities, until the new one (coming out soon) for entities, W'8BEN-E comes out.



Have an IRS Problem?



Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation at:   
 www.TaxAid.us or www.TaxLaw.ms or
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid ( 888 882-9243888 882-9243 )

Monday, March 10, 2014

Weil Ex-UBS Chief Pleads Not Guilty to US Tax Charges -- Are You Kidding Me?




We previously posted on December 16, 2013, The 2nd Ex-UBS Banker is About to Blow The Whistle on His US Clients! where we discussed that the former head of UBS's wealth management division, Raoul Weil, has agreed to be extradited to the US to face charges and U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick Hunt agreed to let Weil stay with friends in New Jersey after putting up the bond, which included $9 million in a personal surety by Weil, $500,000 from the New Jersey family and the other $1 million a corporate surety bond signed with a bail bondsman.
US authorities issued an international arrest warrant for Weil in early 2009, just months after he was charged with allegedly conspiring to help 17,000 American clients of Swiss bank UBS avoid taxes.


We also discussed that another UBS Banker, Bradley Birkenfeld (See our post:IRS awash in whistleblowers after $104M payout!) who became a whistle blower and was awarded a $104 million reward from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and this may happen all over again, now that Raoul Weil is facing trial in the U.S.



Well it now appears fairly obvious that he has Cut A Deal with the IRS, since a Florida judge granted him $10.5 million bail on December 16, 2013. He did not enter a plea and his arraignment was postponed until January 7.


Weil's appearance in federal court in Fort Lauderdale on Tuesday January 7, was his second since he was extradited from Italy last month. He was granted a $10.5 million bond, pending his arraignment at his first court hearing on December 16.

Lawyers for UBS whistleblower Bradley Birkenfeld, the bank employee who revealed the tax fraud conspiracy to U.S. authorities in 2007, fear that Weil may be negotiating a "sweetheart deal" that would spare him a trial and cause him to reveal secret account holders and other bankers to avoid prosecution.

Birkenfeld worked directly under Weil when he headed UBS's former cross-border banking business, have been highly critical of what they often describe as the U.S. government's failure to prosecute UBS and some of its former top executives.



Birkenfeld, who knew the inner workings of UBS and spilled many secrets about his former employer's dealings with U.S. clients, won a record-setting $104 million reward from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service for exposing the UBS tax fraud conspiracy. On October 5, 2012, we posted IRS awash in whistleblowers after $104M payout! where we discussed that Bradley Birkenfeld's $104 million reward from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service set a record and has helped set off a rush of would-be imitators hoping to cash in on a government program to catch tax cheats.

Weil knows where all the skeletons are buried and has probably already made a deal to divulge who what he knows about his U.S. clients.

If convicted, Raoul Weil faces up to five years in prison for conspiracy to commit tax fraud. The judge ordered Weil be placed on a GPS monitoring system and surrender his passport.



Was This Guy Your Banker?


Are You One of the 17,000 American Clients?


 Contact the Tax Lawyers at  
Marini & Associates, P.A.







for a FREE Tax Consultation at:

Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243)
 
Source