According to Law360, a Connecticut federal judge denied a man's attempt to vacate his guilty plea for tax evasion, despite accepting that his lawyers had misled him into believing that if he received no prison time he could avoid mandatory detention and likely deportation by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Vishal Dhar's former attorneys didn't testify under oath against his claim that
they told him he could avoid deportation if he received noncustodial
incarceration, but the attorneys did tell him he faced deportation for
pleading guilty to an aggravated felony, according to an order issued on April 16, 2025. Dhar's former attorneys, Scott Ahroni and Kurt Erskine of Polsinelli PC, warned him
as early as November 2023 that he faced deportation for tax evasion above
$10,000, according to the order by U.S. District Judge Stefan R. Underhill,
who sentenced Dhar
to a year in federal custody in October.
Dhar, who is from India, became a U.S. legal permanent resident in 2007, the
order said.
He now faces mandatory detention by ICE pending an order for his deportation
after he is released from federal custody, potentially extending his original
one-year sentence beyond two years since he's not eligible to reduce his
sentence with time served, his new attorney said in a motion from
January.
Dhar alleged that his original attorneys advised him that he would only be
deported if he received a custodial incarceration sentence, according to the
order. The Polsinelli attorneys objected to these allegations in an unsworn
statement, but not under oath, so Judge Underhill accepted Dhar's account as
accurate, according to the order.
"Polsinelli's assistance fell below an objective standard of
reasonableness when they allegedly advised Dhar that 'deportation would likely
only happen' if Dhar received a custodial incarceration sentence," Judge
Underhill said.
To prove ineffective counsel requires not only showing the attorneys performed
below a reasonable norm for their profession, but that their performance was
prejudicial against their client's defense, according to the order. In this
case, Dhar argued he would not have pled guilty and would have insisted on
going to trial, according to the order.
Yet Dhar inaccurately claimed that he was only made aware of the deportation
consequences of his conviction after sentencing, according to the order. This
doesn't line up with the evidence in his communications with Polsinelli, the
plea agreement, the sentencing memorandum and his own statements at the plea
hearing, which all suggest he was fully aware that his guilty plea could result
in deportation, the order said.
That Being Deported Was A Likely Consequence Of His Plea," Judge Underhill Said.
"Polsinelli's failure to bring the relevant statutes to my attention did not prejudice Dhar because it did not impact my intent to sentence Dhar to a term of custodial incarceration," Judge Underhill said. "My underlying reasoning in sentencing Dhar is entirely separate from any immigration consequences he may face, including being placed in ICE custody and eventually deported."
Dhar was sentenced in October to just over a year in federal prison after pleading guilty to evading over $272,000 in taxes from 2013 through 2023, an amount that he paid prior to his sentencing, according to court filings. He operated three business entities, including Grey Brown Inc., a holding company for a restaurant chain called Oaxaca Taqueria, as well as NY Cloud Kitchens LLC and West Partners Inc., according to court filings.
Have an IRS Tax Problem?
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)
No comments:
Post a Comment