Monday, May 18, 2015

IRS Targets Offshore Service Providers!

We previously posted DOJ / IRS Obtains Court Orders to Seek Offshore Account Data From 5 U.S. Banks!where we discussed that U.S. District Judge Kimba M. Wood of the Southern District of New York entered an order on Nov. 7, 2013, authorizing the IRS to issue summonses requiring:
  1. Bank of New York Mellon (Mellon) and
  2. Citibank NA (Citibank) to produce information about U.S. taxpayers who may be evading or have evaded federal taxes by holding interests in undisclosed accounts at Zurcher Kantonalbank and its affiliates (collectively, ZKB) in Switzerland.
U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman of the Southern District of New York entered an order Nov. 12, 2013authorizing the IRS to issue summonses requiring:
  1. Mellon, Citibank,
  2. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA (JPMorgan),
  3. HSBC Bank USA NA (HSBC), and
  4. Bank of America NA (Bank of America) to produce similar information in connection with undisclosed accounts at The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited and its affiliates (collectively, Butterfield) in the Bahamas, Barbados, Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Hong Kong, Malta, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.
 
In these actions, the Court granted the IRS permission to serve what are known as "John Doe" summonses on Mellon, Citibank, JPMorgan, HSBC, and Bank of America

The IRS uses John Doe summonses to obtain information about possible tax fraud by individuals whose identities are unknown. The John Doe summonses approved today direct these five banks to produce records identifying U.S. taxpayers with accounts at ZKB, Butterfield and their affiliates, including other foreign banks that used ZKB and Butterfield's U.S. correspondent accounts at Mellon, Citibank, JPMorgan, HSBC, and Bank of America to service U.S. clients.

This includes the names of taxpayers who had an account with CIBC FirstCaribbean International Bank over an eight-year period ending Dec. 31 without disclosing it to the IRS. It is too soon to say how many U.S. citizens held undeclared accounts at FirstCaribbean or what penalties they may face, Justice Department spokeswoman Dena Iverson said Nov. 12, 2013. FirstCaribbean does not have any branches in the United States but it has what's known as a correspondent account with Wells Fargo that allowed U.S. citizens to do business with the bank.

The U.S. obtained the order from a judge Nov. 12, 2013.after an IRS revenue agent reviewed information from 129 people who voluntarily came forward to disclose offshore accounts and decided further scrutiny of FirstCaribbean was warranted.


“Our goal is to drive people into compliance,” said Carolyn Schenk, senior counsel with the IRS in Los Angeles. “We realize that we are not going to audit our way out of this problem.”
The private banking focus will therefore continue. Ms. Schenk announced that “in the near future you are going to see John Doe summonses again with regard to correspondent accounts here in the U.S. of multiple offshore banks.” 




By issuing these John Doe summonses, we continue our joint efforts with the IRS to identify and hold accountable those who try to evade their legal responsibility to pay taxes."

The U.S. Internal Revenue Service is planning to broaden the use of subpoenas of documents in cases where the name of a taxpayer under investigation is not known.


Brian Stiernagle, program manager of the IRS Offshore Compliance Initiative, speaking at the Offshore Alert conference in Miami reiterated that the IRS is now going to target service providers that help facilitate offshore tax evasion both in the U.S. and abroad.

"International issues remain a major focus for the IRS, and we are continuing our efforts to fight tax evaders who use offshore accounts to skirt the law," said IRS Acting Commissioner Werfel. "These John Doe summonses for correspondent account records show our determination to pursue evaders using offshore accounts, even if the person hiding money overseas chooses a bank that has no offices on U.S. soil."






The IRS has also identified a number of abusive offshore service providers and consultants in the U.S. who help facilitate tax evasion and the agency will issue further summonses against them. 

“These consultants are setting up structures, they are acting as nominees, providing mail forwarding services, all types of things with the goal of helping U.S. persons hide their assets,” Ms. Schenk said.

For a John Doe summons to be granted by a court, the IRS has to provide evidence that tax evasion by a class or group of unknown individuals may have occurred at a bank. In recent years, the information that forms a “reasonable basis” for suspecting tax evasion has come from two main sources: various offshore voluntary disclosure programs and whistleblowers.

Federal tax law requires U.S. taxpayers to pay taxes on all income earned worldwide. U.S. taxpayers must also report foreign financial accounts if the total value of the accounts exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year. Willful failure to report a foreign account can result in a fine of up to 50 percent of the amount in the account at the time of the violation.

 
 



3rd Swiss Bank Agrees to Turn Over Names to the IRS


On May 11, 2015, More & More Swiss Banks Are Striking Deals With the DoJ! where we discussed that Vadian Bank AG (Vadian), located in St. Gallen, Switzerland, became the second Swiss Bank  to reach a resolution under the DOJ's Swiss Bank Program. 


On Friday, May 11, 2015 the The Department of Justice (DoJ ) announced Finter Bank Zurich AG (Finter), located in Zurich, Switzerland, was the 3rd Swiss Bank to reach a resolution under the department’s Swiss Bank Program.

 "I would stay tuned," Acting Assistant Attorney General Caroline Ciraolo of the Justice Department's Tax Division, adding that a number of non-prosecution agreements will be signed in the "very near future." 
 
“Simultaneously, the department has opened investigations of culpable individuals and entities based on information obtained from the Swiss banks in the program, and will pursue and prosecute those engaged or assisting others in evading U.S. tax obligations.”

Under the program, banks are required to:
  • Make a complete disclosure of their cross-border activities;
  • Provide detailed information on an account-by-account basis for accounts in which U.S. taxpayers have a direct or indirect interest;
  • Cooperate in treaty requests for account information;
  • Provide detailed information as to other banks that transferred funds into secret accounts or that accepted funds when secret accounts were closed (a/k/a Levers List);
  • Agree to close accounts of account holders who fail to come into compliance with U.S. reporting obligations; and
  • Pay appropriate penalties.
Banks meeting all of the above requirements are eligible for a non-prosecution agreement.

According to the terms of the non-prosecution agreement signed today, Finter agrees to cooperate in any related criminal or civil proceedings, demonstrate its implementation of controls to stop misconduct involving undeclared U.S. accounts and pay a $5.414 million penalty in return for the department’s agreement not to prosecute Finter for tax-related criminal offenses.

 According to the terms of its non-prosecution agreement, Vadian agrees to cooperate in any related criminal or civil proceedings, demonstrate its implementation of controls to stop misconduct involving undeclared U.S. accounts and pay a $4.253 million penalty in return for the department’s agreement not to prosecute Vadian for tax-related criminal offenses.

As a result of leads from banks involved in the voluntary disclosure program, Ciraolo said, the Justice Department is going after individual account holders as well as bankers and other professionals who helped conceal offshore accounts.


While Finter Bank reached a resolution under the department’s Swiss Bank Program; its U.S. account holders who have not yet declared their accounts to the IRS may still be eligible to participate in the IRS’s offshore voluntary disclosure programs, the price of such disclosure has increased.

Do You Have Unreported Foreign Income?
 







Your Information Is Being Reported
To The IRS!





Want to Know if the OVDP Program is Right for You?




Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A. 
 

for a FREE Tax Consultation
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid ((888) 882-9243)







OVDP Penalty Increased To 50% For 15 Foreign Banks



The new revisions to the US offshore voluntary disclosure initiative, which we posted on 6/18/14 "IRS Makes Changes to Offshore Programs; Revisions Ease Burden and Help More Taxpayers Come into Compliance", now provides for and increased 50% FBAR Penalties for 'Willful' Non-Disclosers.

This group includes those individuals who have offshore bank accounts with a foreign financial institution which has been publicly identified as being under investigation, or is cooperating with a government investigation. IRS has published a list of those foreign financial institutions or facilitators. 


The complete list is as follows:
  1. UBS AG
  2. Credit Suisse AG, Credit Suisse Fides, and Clariden Leu Ltd.
  3. Wegelin & Co.
  4. Liechtensteinische Landesbank AG
  5. Zurcher Kantonalbank
  6. Swisspartners
  7. CIBC FirstCaribbean International Bank Limited, its predecessors, subsidiaries, and affiliates
  8. Stanford International Bank, Ltd., Stanford Group Company, and Stanford Trust Company, Ltd.
  9. HSBC India
  10. The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited (also known as Butterfield Bank and Bank of Butterfield).
  11. Sovereign Management & Legal, Ltd., its predecessors, subsidiaries, and affiliates (effective 12/19/14)
  12. Bank Leumi le-Israel B.M., The Bank Leumi le-Israel Trust Company Ltd, Bank Leumi (Luxembourg) S.A., Leumi Private Bank S.A., and Bank Leumi USA (effective 12/22/14)
  13. BSI SA (effective 3/30/15)
  14. Vadian Bank AG (effective 5/8/15)
  15. Finter Bank Zurich AG (effective 5/15/15)  
A list of foreign financial institutions or facilitators meeting this criteria is available.

Of course, the IRS may add names to that list at any time, and whole groups of taxpayers will then be cut-off from OVDP without prior notice.

The same goes for taxpayers who worked with a "facilitator" who helped the taxpayer establish or maintain an offshore arrangement if the facilitator has been publicly identified as being under investigation or as cooperating with a government investigation. 


Taxpayers who had undeclared income from one of these 14 Banks are still be eligible to enter the OVDP, but they will be subject to a 50% offshore penalty, rather than the existing 27.5 percent penalty.

Of course if the IRS already has a particular taxpayer's name, then that person will not be eligible to enter the OVDP, and could be subject to multiple FBAR penalties.


Do You Have Undeclared Income from One
of the 14 Banks under Investigation by the IRS?






Want to Know if the OVDP Program is Right for You?


Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.  
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation


Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid ((888) 882-9243)

Wednesday, May 13, 2015

US Regulatory Costs Are A $1.9T 'Hidden Tax According to a Recent Report

According to law360.com, Federal regulations are costing U.S. taxpayers nearly $1.9 trillion annually in compliance costs, which effectively serve as a “hidden tax” surpassing the revenue the government pulls in from individual income tax collections, according to a report released Tuesday by a public policy think tank. Meanwhile, the federal government raked in $1.3 trillion in individual income taxes last year, the report says.

On average, regulatory compliance costs $1.88 trillion annually, and if U.S. households fully bore the responsibility for that amount, they would each pay nearly $15,000 a year, says CEI’s annual Ten Thousand Commandments survey of federal regulations.



















“If it were a country, U.S. regulation would be the world’s tenth-largest economy, ranking behind Russia and ahead of India,” the report says. “U.S. regulatory costs exceed each of the [gross domestic products] of Australia and Canada, the highest income nations among the countries ranked most free in the annual Index of Economic Freedom and Economic Freedom of the World reports.”

 

The report also adds that the federal government’s share of the U.S. economy now exceeds 30 percent when regulatory costs are added to the $3.5 trillion the government spent in 2014.



Have A Tax Problem?

 

Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.



for a FREE Tax Consultation
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid - (888)882-9243 FREE.




Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Everything You Wanted to Know About and Offer in Compromise

Offer in Compromise


ALERT
Please use the most current revision of Form 656-B in preparing and submitting your Offer in Compromise. Use of outdated forms and instructions may cause a delay in the processing of your offer application.

An offer in compromise allows you to settle your tax debt for less than the full amount you owe. It may be a legitimate option if you can't pay your full tax liability, or doing so creates a financial hardship. We consider your unique set of facts and circumstances:
  • Ability to pay;
  • Income;
  • Expenses; and
  • Asset equity.
The IRS will generally approve an offer in compromise when the amount offered represents the most which they can expect to collect within a reasonable period of time. Explore all other payment options before submitting an offer in compromise. The Offer in Compromise program is not for everyone.

If you hire a tax professional to help you file an offer, be sure to check his or her qualifications.

Make sure you are eligible

Before the IRS can consider your offer, you must be current with all filing and payment requirements. You are not eligible if you are in an open bankruptcy proceeding. Use the Offer in Compromise Pre-Qualifier to confirm your eligibility and prepare a preliminary proposal.

Submit your offer

You'll find step-by-step instructions and all the forms for submitting an offer in the Offer in Compromise Booklet, Form 656-B (PDF).  Your completed offer package will include:
  • Form 433-A (OIC) (individuals) or 433-B (OIC) (businesses) and all required documentation as specified on the forms;
  • Form 656(s) - individual and business tax debt (Corporation/ LLC/ Partnership) must be submitted on separate Form 656;
  • $186 application fee (non-refundable); and
  • Initial payment (non-refundable) for each Form 656.

Select a payment option

Your initial payment will vary based on your offer and the payment option you choose:
  • Lump Sum Cash: Submit an initial payment of 20 percent of the total offer amount with your application. Wait for written acceptance, then pay the remaining balance of the offer in five or fewer payments.
  • Periodic Payment: Submit your initial payment with your application. Continue to pay the remaining balance in monthly installments while the IRS considers your offer. If accepted, continue to pay monthly until it is paid in full.
If you meet the Low Income Certification guidelines, you do not have to send the application fee or the initial payment and you will not need to make monthly installments during the evaluation of your offer. See your application package for details.

Understand the process

While your offer is being evaluated:
  • Your non-refundable payments and fees will be applied to the tax liability (you may designate payments to a specific tax year and tax debt);
  • A Notice of Federal Tax Lien may be filed;
  • Other collection activities are suspended;
  • The legal assessment and collection period is extended;
  • Make all required payments associated with your offer;
  • You are not required to make payments on an existing installment agreement; and
  • Your offer is automatically accepted if the IRS does not make a determination within two years of the IRS receipt date.
If your offer is acceptedIf your offer is rejected
  • You must meet all the Offer Terms listed in Section 8 of Form 656, including filing all required tax returns and making all payments;
  • Any refunds due within the calendar year in which your offer is accepted will be applied to your tax debt;
  • Federal tax liens are not released until your offer terms are satisfied; and
  • Certain offer information is available for public review at designated IRS offices.
  • You may appeal a rejection within 30 days using Request for Appeal of Offer in Compromise, Form 13711 (PDF).



Have A Tax Problem?
 

  Want to Know if Your Qualify for an Offer?
 
 

Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.

for a FREE Tax Consultation
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888)882-9243.

Monday, May 11, 2015

More & More Swiss Banks Are Striking Deals With the DoJ!

On April 9, 2015, we posted More Swiss Banks Are Striking Deals With the DoJ Including Providing Your Tax Information! where we discussed that during the week of March 30, 2015, Swiss bank BSI SA became the first bank to reach a resolution under a voluntary disclosure program for tax-related offenses run by the Justice Department. BSI agreed to pay a $211 million penalty after admitting it had for decades assisted thousands of U.S. clients in opening accounts in Switzerland and hiding assets from tax authorities.

"I would stay tuned," Acting Assistant Attorney General Caroline Ciraolo of the Justice Department's Tax Division said in an interview late on Tuesday, adding that a number of non-prosecution agreements will be signed in the "very near future."

On Friday, May 8, 2015 the The Department of Justice (DoJ ) announced that Vadian Bank AG (Vadian), located in St. Gallen, Switzerland, reached a resolution under the DOJ's Swiss Bank Program.

“The department continues to work with Swiss banks to reach final resolutions in accordance with the terms of the program, and is focused on its goal of completing this process expeditiously,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Caroline D. Ciraolo, of the Department of Justice’s Tax Division.


“Simultaneously, the department has opened investigations of culpable individuals and entities based on information obtained from the Swiss banks in the program, and will pursue and prosecute those engaged or assisting others in evading U.S. tax obligations.”


Under the program, banks are required to:
  • Make a complete disclosure of their cross-border activities;
  • Provide detailed information on an account-by-account basis for accounts in which U.S. taxpayers have a direct or indirect interest;
  • Cooperate in treaty requests for account information;
  • Provide detailed information as to other banks that transferred funds into secret accounts or that accepted funds when secret accounts were closed (a/k/a Levers List);
  • Agree to close accounts of account holders who fail to come into compliance with U.S. reporting obligations; and
  • Pay appropriate penalties.
Banks meeting all of the above requirements are eligible for a non-prosecution agreement.


According to the terms of its non-prosecution agreement, Vadian agrees to cooperate in any related criminal or civil proceedings, demonstrate its implementation of controls to stop misconduct involving undeclared U.S. accounts and pay a $4.253 million penalty in return for the department’s agreement not to prosecute Vadian for tax-related criminal offenses.


In 2008, after it became publicly known that UBS was a target of a criminal investigation, Vadian accepted accounts from U.S. persons who were forced out of other Swiss banks.  At this time, Vadian’s management was aware that the U.S. authorities were pursuing Swiss banks that facilitated tax evasion for U.S. accountholders in Switzerland, but was not deterred because Vadian had no U.S. presence.  As a result of its efforts, after August 2008, Vadian attracted cross-border private banking business and increased its U.S. related accounts from two to more than 70, with $76 million in assets under management.

In resolving its criminal liabilities under the program, Vadian provided extensive cooperation and encouraged U.S. accountholders to come into compliance.

As a result of leads from banks involved in the voluntary disclosure program, Ciraolo said, the Justice Department is going after individual account holders as well as bankers and other professionals who helped conceal offshore accounts.


While Vadian’s U.S. accountholders who have not yet declared their accounts to the IRS may still be eligible to participate in the IRS’s offshore voluntary disclosure programs, the price of such disclosure has increased.

Do You Have Unreported Foreign Income?
 



Your Information Is Being Reported
To The IRS!




Want to Know if the OVDP Program is Right for You?


Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A. 
 

for a FREE Tax Consultation
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid ((888) 882-9243)

Friday, May 8, 2015

It Must Be The Time To Expatriate?

We previously posted on April 8, 2015, Is it Time to Expatriate?  where we discussed that the list of recent US expatriates’ is a diverse: one of the world’s greatest soul singers; a best-selling author, a professional basketball player, architects, artists, lawyers, retirees and financiers. The register of individuals who have “chosen to expatriate”, as the US puts it, shows an increase in the number of Americans who are renouncing their US citizenship or turning in their green card.


When the number reached 3,415 last year it was a record, although the figures are still tiny, especially in comparison with those being granted US citizenship, nearly 780,000 in 2013. But it is also the case that the numbers have risen more than 10-fold since 2008. 

However, the percentage of Americans Expatriating increased by almost 20% in the first quarter of 2015, according to IRS's quarterly list, for the quarter ending March 31.2015, of individuals who have chosen to expatriate.

The 1,335 Expatriations in the quarter ending March 31, 2015 is a new record. These Americans are driven to turn in their passports in part because of laws that have expanded bank reporting and tax compliance requirements for expatriates. 

"Should I Stay or Should I Go"?


Need Advise on Expatriation ... 


Contact the Tax Lawyers of
Marini & Associates, P.A.



for a FREE Tax Consultation
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid ((888) 882-9243)