Thursday, May 7, 2015

Caterpillar Faces Criminal Probe In Addition to IRS Penalties Related to its Offshore Tax Strategy

We had previously posted Caterpillar Saved Billions in US Tax By Shifting Profits to a Swiss Subsidiary where we discussed that Caterpillar Inc., an American manufacturing icon, used a wholly owned Swiss affiliate to shift $8 billion in profits from the United States to Switzerland to take advantage of a special 4 to 6 percent corporate tax rate it negotiated with the Swiss government and defer or avoid paying $2.4 billion in U.S. taxes to date, a new report from Sen. Carl Levin, the chairman of the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations shows.

The report by the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations said the company used a tax strategy built around redirecting to Switzerland taxable profits from sales of Caterpillar-branded replacement parts manufactured by third parties under contract with the company. Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) senateinquiry found that Caterpillar saved as much as $2.4 billion in taxes over 13 years from what , then chairman of the committee, said was a “paper change.”

In exchange for a small royalty, Caterpillar transferred rights to profits from its international parts distribution business to Caterpillar SARL, or CSARL, the report said. In effect, Caterpillar redirected the profits by simply replacing its name with CSARL on its invoices, according to the report

Prior to issuing its license with CSARL, Caterpillar booked 85 percent or more of its non-U.S. parts profits in the U.S., where 70 percent of those parts are made and warehoused and where its global parts operation was created and is managed. But the license allowed CSARL to sell the parts to Caterpillar’s non-U.S. dealers and pay Caterpillar a royalty equal to only about 15 percent of the parts profits, while keeping the remaining 85 percent on its books in Switzerland, the Senate investigators found.

Now this federal probe into Caterpillar Inc.’s elaborate tax avoidance strategy highlighted in a Senate hearing last year has pivoted in a criminal direction with the global manufacturer of construction and mining equipment acknowledging a grand jury investigation by the U.S. attorney for the Central District of Illinois.
Caterpillar disclosed, in its most recent 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, that it is responding to a grand jury subpoena received Jan. 8, 2015  In the same 10-Q, dated May 1, 2015, Caterpillar acknowledged responding to separate investigative demands placed by the SEC and the IRS.
Caterpillar indicated that the IRS has “proposed” tax increases and penalties of about $1 billion after examining its U.S. returns for 2007-09, including a loss carryback to 2005.

The Internal Revenue Service has proposed taxing U.S. profits the company earned from certain parts transactions by its Caterpillar SARL unit based in Switzerland, Caterpillar. The IRS is also disallowing about $125 million of foreign tax credits from financing unrelated to the Swiss entity. The company received the IRS revenue agent’s report on Jan. 30, 2015.  


Caroline Nolan, a spokeswoman for PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, which helped create the transactions, had no immediate comment on the matter.     


In August, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled that Caterpillar can't use foreign-dividend deductions to increase its state operating losses, overriding a tax court decision to let the company claim tax refunds by literally drawing new blanks on its state tax forms.
The state high court ruled that using foreign dividend deductions violates state law, overturning a 2008 tax court ruling allowing the company to count foreign-source dividend income in its 2000-03 calculations of its net operating losses in Indiana and carry the losses into other tax years. The construction and mining giant is incorporated in Delaware and has its headquarters in Illinois but has hundreds of subsidiaries.

It looks like Caterpillar may need several of its earth movers, to dig its way out of its Tax Problems!


Have a Tax Problem?
 

Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.


 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid ().



Sources:
US SENATE REPORT

Bloomberg

Law360

Wednesday, May 6, 2015

BVI Opens Portal for FATCA Registration & The Bahamas Gears up for FATCA

British Virgin Islands – FATCA

The British Virgin Islands opens its Financial Account Reporting System to enable financial institutions to register and submit information on their U.S. clients in line with the BVI's agreement with the U.S. on its Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act. The system is available to financial institutions that need to register in order to submit information to the government under the intergovernmental agreement between the BVI and the U.S., according to a news release.

Financial institutions must register by June 1 and report information regarding the 2014 tax year by June 30.

The British Virgin Islands has opened its Financial Account Reporting System (BVIFARS) to enable financial institutions to register and submit information on their U.S. clients in line with the BVI's agreement with the U.S. on its Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act.

The system is available to financial institutions that need to register in order to submit information to the government under the intergovernmental agreement between the BVI and the U.S., according to an April 15 news release.

Financial institutions must register by June 1 and report information regarding the 2014 tax year by June 30. The BVI government will then transmit the information to the Internal Revenue Service.
The government said financial institutions that have nothing to report aren't obligated to file a “nil report.”

“As such, if there is nothing to report, there is no mandatory requirement to enroll with BVIFARS,” the government said. “However, BVIFARS has the capability to accept nil reports and if a financial institution chooses to submit a nil report, then that financial institution will have to enroll.”

Bahamas – FATCA
 
Bahamas gears up for FATCA – video - Guidelines regarding the US Foreign Accounts Tax Compliance Act are nearing completion, according to government officials.




As we previously posted on Friday, February 27, 2015, FATCA Update! - 112 FATCA Agreement To Date!,where we discussed that there was a total to 112 jurisdictions with FATCA agreement with the United States, including the BVI & Bahamas.

Do You Have Unreported Foreign Income?



Is Your Foreign Account in
Any of the Countries Mentioned Below?



Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.  
for a FREE Tax Consultation
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid ()
_____________________________
See Below For Types of FATCA Agreements Signed

By Each Country and Links to the Actual Agreements.

The following jurisdictions are treated as having an intergovernmental agreement in effect (scroll down for a list of jurisdictions with agreements in substance):
Jurisdictions that have signed agreements:
Model 1 IGA
Model 2 IGA

Jurisdictions that have reached agreements in substance as of June 30, 2014 and have consented to being included on this list (beginning on the date indicated in parenthesis):
Model 1 IGA
  • Algeria (6-30-2014)
  • Anguilla (6-30-2014)
  • Antigua and Barbuda (6-3-2014)
  • Azerbaijan (5-16-2014)
  • Bahrain (6-30-2014)
  • Belarus (6-6-2014)
  • Cabo Verde (6-30-2014)
  • China (6-26-2014)
  • Colombia (4-23-2014)
  • Croatia (4-2-2014)
  • Dominica (6-19-2014)
  • Dominican Republic (6-30-2014)
  • Georgia (6-12-201)
  • Greenland (6-29-2014)
  • Grenada (6-16-2014)
  • Guyana (6-24-2014)
  • Haiti (6-30-2014)
  • India (4-11-2014)
  • Indonesia (5-4-2014)
  • Kosovo (4-2-2014)
  • Kuwait (5-1-2014)
  • Malaysia (6-30-2014)
  • Montenegro (6-30-2014)
  • Panama (5-1-2014)
  • Peru (5-1-2014)
  • Portugal (4-2-2014)
  • Romania (4-2-2014)
  • St. Kitts and Nevis (6-4-2014)
  • St. Lucia (6-12-2014)
  • St. Vincent and the Grenadines (6-2-2014)
  • Saudi Arabia (6-24-2014)
  • Serbia (6-30-2014)
  • Seychelles (5-28-2014)
  • Slovak Republic (4-11-2014)
  • South Korea (4-2-2014)
  • Thailand (6-24-2014)
  • Turkey (6-3-2014)
  • Turkmenistan (6-3-2014)
  • Ukraine (6-26-2014)
  • United Arab Emirates (5-21-2014)
  • Uzbekistan (6-30-2014)
Model 2 IGA
  • Armenia (5-8-2014)
  • Iraq (6-30-2014)
  • Nicaragua (6-30-2014)
  • Paraguay (6-6-2014)
  • San Marino (6-30-2014)
  • Taiwan (6-23-2014)*

*Consistent with the Taiwan Relations Act, the parties to the agreement would be the American Institute in Taiwan and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States.
Jurisdictions that have reached agreements in substance as of November 30, 2014 and have consented to being included on this list (beginning on the date indicated in parenthesis):
Model 1 IGA
  • Angola (11-30-2014)
  • Cambodia (11-30-2014)
  • Greece (11-30-2014)
  • Holy See (11-30-2014)
  • Iceland (11-30-2014)
  • Kazakhstan (11-30-2014)
  • Montserrat (11-30-2014)
  • Philippines (11-30-2014)
  • Trinidad and Tobago (11-30-2014)
  • Tunisia (11-30-2014)
Model 2 IGA
  • Macao (11-30-2014)

FinCEN Targets Money Laundering Infrastructure with "GTO" in Miami Which Overrides Banking Secrecy


The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued a Geographic Targeting Order (GTO)  to about 700 Miami businesses to shed light on cash transactions that may be tied to trade-based money laundering schemes. This is the third GTO, since August 2014.

These complex schemes are a primary method used by drug cartels, including the Sinaloa and Los Zetas, to launder their illicit proceeds. FinCEN's order is aimed at disrupting the illicit financial infrastructure upon which these drug trafficking organizations rely.

FinCEN, in coordination with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and Miami Dade State Attorney's Office South Florida Money Laundering Strike Force, issued the GTO on electronics exporters located near Miami, Florida. 

Law enforcement investigations reveal that many of these businesses are exploited as part of sophisticated trade–based money laundering schemes in which drug proceeds in the United States are converted into goods that are shipped to South America and sold for local currency, which is ultimately transferred to drug cartels. This GTO enhances the transparency of the covered businesses' transactions; it does not make any determination about their knowledge or lack thereof of the money laundering schemes.

Have a Criminal Tax Problem?
 

Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid ().



 Source:FinCEN

Monday, May 4, 2015

IRS Releases 2012 Corporation Income Tax Returns Complete Report (Publication 16)

Tables presenting statistics from the Form 1120 series are now available in 2012 Corporation Income Tax Returns Complete Report (Publication 16). Published annually, these tables present comprehensive data on corporation income tax returns.

This release includes returns with accounting periods ending July 2012 through June 2013 and includes data from Forms 1120, 1120F, 1120L, 1120PC, 1120RIC, 1120REIT, and 1120S. 

Data are classified by industry, size of total assets, and size of business receipts. Separate tabulations of data reported on Form 1120S, U.S. Income Tax Return for an S Corporation, are also included. 

This report presents statistical estimates based on a stratified sample of more than 110,004 unaudited returns selected from the nearly 5.8 million active corporate returns filed for Tax Year 2012. This tax year includes accounting periods ending July 2012 through June 2013. 

Six sections make up this report. 
  • Section 1 provides statistics summarizing overall corporate activity for Tax Year 2012.
  • Section 2 discusses changes in laws and regulations between this report and that for Tax Year 2011. 
  • Section 3 describes, in detail, the sample of income tax returns, method of estimation used, sampling variability of the data, and other limitations. 
  • Section 4 presents tables containing detailed statistics on assets, liabilities, receipts, deductions, net income, income tax liability, tax credits, and other financial data for 2012. It also includes data submitted on Form 1120S, U.S. Income Tax Return for an S Corporation, unless specifically excluded by the table. Form 1120S data are also shown separately toward the end of the section. Statistics are presented by industry, asset size, business receipts size, tax form type, accounting period ended, and other selected classifiers.
  • Section 5 explains the terms used throughout this report and includes the adjustments made in preparing the statistics and any limitations inherent in the data. 
  • Section 6 consists of the key corporation tax return forms.

Overall Corporate Summary 

Figure A presents corporation summary statistics for Tax Years 2011 and 2012. This data includes the number of returns, total assets, total receipts, and net income (less deficit), income subject to tax, total income tax before credits, and total income tax after credits for active corporations. The number of active corporate tax returns filed increased approximately 0.3 percent between 2011 and 2012. Approximately 3,658,981 corporations filed tax returns electronically in 2011. This number rose 11 percent in 2012, reaching an all-time high of 4,080,293 returns filed electronically.



Total assets for active corporations increased approximately 4.5 percent, from $81.3 trillion in 2011 to $85 trillion in 2012. By sector, Educational Services experienced the largest net decrease, down 4.6 percent from $54.8 billion in 2011 to $52.3 billion in 2012. In contrast, Mining recorded an increase of $115 billion in total assets. It also showed the largest percent change (up 11 percent) for 2012.


Total receipts from operations and investments increased 3.9 percent, from $28.3 trillion in 2011 to $29.4 trillion the following year. This was driven by an 3.8-percent increase in business receipts, from 25.2 trillion in 2011 to 26 trillion in 2012. Investment income showed small decreases during the year. Interest received also declined 7.7 percent, from $1.30 trillion to $1.20 trillion. In comparison, net capital gains rose 20.6 percent, from $151.9 billion in 2011 to $183.2 billion in 2012. Nearly all sectors experienced an increase in total receipts, with the exceptions of Utilities (down 12.5 percent) and Management of Companies (down 3.3 percent).


Total deductions deductions increased 2.2 percent, from $27.1 trillion in 2011 to $27.7 trillion in 2012. The cost of goods sold, a component of total deductions, also rose 2.5 percent during the year, from $16.2 trillion to $16.6 trillion.

 

Corporate pretax profits, also known as net income (less deficit), increased34 percent, from $1.3 trillion to $1.8 trillion (Figure B). When excluding passthrough entities from the total, pretax profi ts increased from $737 billion in 2011 to $1.1 trillion in 2012. In comparison, when only excluding real estate investment trust (REITs), also a passthrough entity, pretax profi ts for all corporations increased by 34.4 percent, from $1,286,201,907 for 2011 and $1,729,289,378 for 2012. (Figure C).


Income subject to tax (the tax base) increased 15.6 percent, from $994 billion in 2011 to $1.1 trillion in 2012. Total income tax before credits rose 15.3 percent, from $349.3 billion to $402.9 billion. Income tax also increased (up 15.5 percent) during the year, from $345.4 billion to $399.1 billion. 

Total income tax after credits, the amount paid to the U.S. Government, rose 21 percent (or $46 billion), from $221 billion in 2011 to $267 billion in 2012. Of the 5.8 million active corporations for Tax Year 2012, approximately 4.2 million were passthrough entities. These entities include regulated investment companies (RICs), REITs and S corporations [1]. Passthrough entities pay little or no Federal income tax at the corporate level. By law, they are required to pass any profi ts or losses to their shareholders, where they are taxed at the individual rate. Pretax profi ts for passthrough entities increased 23.3 percent (or $136.4 billion) during 2012. 

The remaining 1.6 million corporate returns reported total receipts of $22.3 trillion, an increase of 3.1 percent from 2011 to 2012. Excluding pass through entities, approximately 825,000 corporations reported net income for 2012 [2].


Of these, 58.5 percent had a tax liability, compared to 13.7 percent of all corporations with net income. The number of returns with total assets of $2.5 billion or more represented only 0.05 percent of total returns, but 81.3 percent of total assets (Figure A). 

These 3,051 returns for 2012 accounted for 51.4 percent of the total receipts, 67.2 percent of net income (less deficit), 77.1 percent of income subject to tax, 77.6 percent of total income tax before credits, and 70.3 percent of total income tax after credits. 

Approximately 45.4 percent of all returns with net income and total assets greater than $2.5 billion had a tax liability for 2012. Excluding passthrough entities, this percentage increased to 88.2 percent for the year.


Have a Tax Problem?
 

Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.


 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).