Tuesday, March 14, 2017

FinCen Announces That Fbar's Are Automatically Extended until October 15!

On February 22, 2017 we posted Your FBAR Is Due in April This Year! where we discussed that the new law, for returns for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2015, the due date of FinCEN Report 114 will be Apr. 15, with a maximum extension of 6 months ending on Oct. 15.

Now FinCEN has issued a new report providing that while new annual due date for filing Reports of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) for foreign financial accounts is April 15; to implement the statute with minimal burden to the public and FinCEN, FinCEN will grant filers failing to meet the FBAR annual due date of April 15 an automatic extension to October 15 each year. 

Accordingly, specific requests for this extension are not required. You will not have to file any paperwork with the Department to file Form 114 by October 15. 


If you have foreign bank or investment accounts, make sure to discuss this with your tax advisor. 

If you have not reported these accounts, you may need to go back six or eight years and voluntarily report it to the Department of Treasury and the IRS.  Their is a 325% tax, penalties & interest for not doing this,which can easily exceed the remaining dollars in those accounts.

 Have a Tax Problem? 
 
 
 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).

Tuesday, March 7, 2017

Disregarded Entities Are Not Always Disregarded

Under the check the box rules, entities owned by one person can often be disregarded for federal tax purposes. Such entities are referred to as "disregarded entities." 

As time has progressed since the passage of the check the box rules, the IRS has created more and more exceptions to the disregarded treatment. The following is a summary of the principal exceptions, but is not intended to be exhaustive. If any readers think we have missed anything major, please feel free to comment to this posting.
  1. Status is modified if the single owner of the entity is a bank. Treas. Regs. Section 301.7701-2(c)(2) (iii). 
  2. Status is modified for certain tax liabilities. Treas. Regs. Section 301.7701-2(c)(2)(iii). These include: (1) federal tax liabilities of the entity with respect to any taxable period for which the entity was not disregarded; (2) federal tax liabilities of any other entity for which the entity is liable; and (3) refunds or credits of federal tax. 
  3. Disregarded status ignored or modified for taxes imposed under Subtitle - Employment Taxes and Collection of Income Tax (Chapters 21, 22, 23, 23A 24, and 25 of the Code) and taxes imposed under Subtitle A including Chapter 2 - Tax on SelffEmployment Income. Treas. Regs. Section 301.7701-2(c) (2) (iv) (A). 
  4. Status is modified for certain excise taxes, as described in Treas.Regs. Section 301.7701-2(c)(2J(v). Although liability for excise taxes isn't dependent on an entity's classification, an entity's classification is relevant for certain tax administration purposes, such as determining the proper location for filing a notice of federal tax lien and the place for hand-carrying a return under Code Section 6091
  5. Conduit financing proposed regulations will treat a disregarded entity as separate from its single member. Code Section 7701 (I).
  6. Special rules will apply in hybrid situations. Hybrid situations are circumstances where an entity is not disregarded in one jurisdiction but is disregarded in another.
  7. Recently enacted final regulations (TD 9796) that treat domestic disregarded entities wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by foreign persons  as domestic corporations solely for purposes of making them subject to the reporting requirements under Internal Revenue Code, Section 6038A that apply to 25% foreign-owned domestic corporations.
 
Have a Tax Problem?  
 


 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).
 
 
 
 


 

Monday, March 6, 2017

The Estate Tax Challenge

We previously posted on November 14, 2016 Trump Presidency Could Be Death Knell For Estate Taxes! where we discussed President-Elect Trump's tax plans, which includes the repeal of the US Estate & Gift taxes.

This may be a realistic possibility considering that this is in line with some of the proposals in the Republican House Ways & Means Committee Report of June 24, 2016 and especially when you consider that now the Republican's Control both the Senate and the Congress.

There are some differences that will need to be ironed out, including that Trump’s proposal would still allow the step-up in basis for estates under USD10 million but the Republican Party's proposal would simply abolish the tax without allowing step-up.


However, our Estate Tax Counsel, Robert S Blumenfeld, Esq., would like to point out that
dating back to the 1960s, an ongoing battle has been waged between Republicans and Democrats over the concept of the Federal Estate Tax.  During this fifty-year plus battle, Republicans have sought to eliminate or at least emasculate the FET while the Democrats fought to increase the impact of the FET on larger estates. The upshot of this is been best while there is a much larger credit shelter, $5.5 million dollars ($11 million for a husband and wife) today than  the $60,000 credit shelter extent in the 1960s, the number of devices or gimmicks available to lessen the impact of the FET has been legislatively reduced or eliminated. 

One of Donald Trump's chief campaign promises is the elimination of the FET. That he is supported by a majority in both houses of Congress would seem to give some impetus to his idea. Unfortunately, the concept proposed by POTUS does not seem fully thought through.  The Federal Estate Tax is not a one-dimensional tax; it is an interlinking conglomerate of The Estate Tax, The Gift Tax, The Capital Gains Tax, and the Generation Skipping Tax. None of these taxes stands on its own; each is interdependent on the implementation of at least two of the other three taxes. This void does not seem to have been addressed by the POTUS in much detail. 
President Trump will be opposed by three very powerful opponents; the Democratic Party, the insurance lobby, and the lobbies composed  of various charities. In addition, since his inauguration, Pres. Trump has done little to assuage the concerns of many Republicans Congressman and may not be able to count on complete backing by every Republican Sen. or member of the House of Representatives. 
This whole scenario gives us great angst when we try to create estate plans for families of wealth. No one really knows where this is going to lead. Everyone has a theory but most of these theories are diverse; there does not seem to be a common thread of agreement. The next five months will be very interesting in terms of the overall tax structuring; unfortunately, we tax planners can only sit on the sidelines and wait for some finality or resolution which should appear by August, 2017.

Have an Estate Tax Problem?
 
 

Estate Tax Problems Require
an Experienced Estate Tax Attorney



Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).
 
 
 
Robert S. Blumenfeld  - 
 Estate Tax Counsel
Mr. Blumenfeld concentrates his practice in the areas of International Tax and Estate Planning, Probate Law, and Representation of Resident and Non-Resident Aliens before the IRS.

Prior to joining Marini & Associates, P.A., he spent 32 years as the Senior Attorney with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Office of Deputy Commissioner, International.
While with the IRS, he examined approximately 2,000 Estate Tax Returns and litigated various international and tax issues associated with these returns.As a result of his experience, he has extensive knowledge of the issues associated with and the preparation of U.S. Estate Tax Returns for Resident and Non-Resident Aliens, Gift Tax Returns, Form 706QDT and Qualified Domestic Trusts.

 







 

Going To Europe This Summer? You Need To Get a Visa!

The European Parliament voted, on 2 March 2017, to suspend the EU's visa waiver program with the US for one year, following the US administration's failure to lift visa restrictions on Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Poland, and Romania.

The European Commission now has two months to reintroduce visas for Americans wishing to travel to Europe.

Citizenship advisory firm Henley & Partners says the outcome could be a 'visa war', with a serious impact on global mobility if US President Trump retaliates in kind.

Have a Tax Problem?  
 


 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).
 
 
 






IRS Investigators Raid Caterpillar Over Swiss Profits

We originally posted on March 31, 2014 Caterpillar Saved Billions in US Tax By Shifting Profits to a Swiss Subsidiary where we discussed that Caterpillar Inc., an American manufacturing icon, used a wholly owned Swiss affiliate to shift $8 billion in profits from the United States to Switzerland to take advantage of a special 4 to 6 percent corporate tax rate it negotiated with the Swiss government and defer or avoid paying $2.4 billion in U.S. taxes to date, a new report from Sen. Carl Levin, the chairman of the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations shows.

Then we posted on May 7, 2015 Caterpillar Faces Criminal Probe In Addition to IRS Penalties Related to its Offshore Tax Strategy where we discussed that this federal probe into Caterpillar Inc.’s elaborate tax avoidance strategy highlighted in a Senate hearing last year has pivoted in a criminal direction with the global manufacturer of construction and mining equipment acknowledging a grand jury investigation by the U.S. attorney for the Central District of Illinois.

Now US Internal Revenue Service agents have searched the premises of machinery maker Caterpillar in a tax investigation related to its Swiss subsidiary Caterpillar SARL.

American law enforcement officials searched the headquarters of heavy machine manufacturer Caterpillar and two other facilities on Thursday March 2, 2017 as part of a tax investigation linked to the firm’s Swiss subsidiary in Geneva.
 

Federal law enforcement agents carry out a search at the headquarters of Caterpillar, in Peoria, Illinois on Thursday, March 2, 2017 (Keystone) 
 
In a statement issued on Thursday, Caterpillar said it believed the search was part of an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) investigation related to profits earned by a Swiss parts subsidiary, Caterpillar SARL, or CSARL. The firm said it was cooperating with law enforcement. 
 
Caterpillar is contesting an IRS demand to levy taxes and penalties of approximately $2 billion arising from its assignment of profit to the Swiss operation, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Caterpillar, in its 2016 annual report, said it is "vigorously contesting" the IRS demand. "We believe that the relevant transactions complied with applicable tax laws and did not violate judicial doctrines," it stated. 
PricewaterhouseCoopers, which was paid $55million to devise the plan while also serving as Caterpillar's auditor, declined comment to Reuters. 
The apparent escalation of the government's tax dispute with Caterpillar comes as the Trump administration and leaders in Congress have said they want to launch a broad overhaul of the corporate tax code, lowering rates and designing the system to encourage companies to keep jobs and profits within the US. 
 
  Have a Tax Problem?  
 


 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).
 
 


 
 
 
Sources:
 
 
 

IRS Issues Draft Versions of Country-By-Country Reporting Instructions

On August 29, 2016 we posted U.S. Treasury Seeks Comments on Form 8975 - CbC Reporting Form where we discussed that the Treasury published a notice in the Federal Register seeking comments on IRS Form 8975 (Country-by-Country Report), which ultimate parent entities of U.S. multinational enterprise (MNE) groups will use for country-by-country (CbC) reporting purposes. Written comments are due by September 21, 2016.
 
Now the IRS has issued draft versions of Form 8975, Country-by-Country Report, Schedule A to that form, and the accompanying instructions. Country-by-country (CbC) reporting is generally required by ultimate parent entities of U.S. multinational enterprise (MNE) groups for tax years beginning on or after June 30, 2016.
 
 
"Businesses or other For-Profits" are to be affected by the new CbC Reporting Requirement, which Treasury estimates
will take 4,680 Hours to Comply With Each Year!

The Regulation § 1.6038-4(d)(1) says that the following information must be included on Form 8975 with respect to each constituent entity of the U.S. MNE group, as required:
  • The complete legal name of the constituent entity.
  • The tax jurisdiction, if any, in which the constituent entity is resident for tax purposes.
  • The tax jurisdiction in which the constituent entity is organized or incorporated (if different from the tax jurisdiction of residence).
  • The tax identification number, if any, used for the constituent entity by the tax administration of the constituent entity's tax jurisdiction of residence.
  • The main business activity or activities of the constituent entity.
In addition, Form 8975 must contain extensive information for each tax jurisdiction in which one or more constituent entities of a U.S. MNE group is resident, presented as an aggregate of the information for the constituent entities resident in each tax jurisdiction (Reg. § 1.6038-4(d)(2)).
 
The reporting period covered by IRS Form 8975 is the period of the ultimate parent entity's applicable financial statement prepared for the 12-month period (or a 52-53 week period described in Section 441(f)) that ends with or within the ultimate parent entity's tax year.

If the ultimate parent entity does not prepare an annual applicable financial statement, the reporting period covered by Form 8975 is the 12-month period (or a 52-53 week period described in Section 441(f)) that ends on the last day of the ultimate parent entity's tax year. (Reg. 1.6038-4(c)).
Whatever the reason for the strides, US Multi-National Entities may soon have an optional method for satisfying their CbC reporting requirements for 2016.
The draft instructions also provide specific guidance on filling out the two parts of the Form 8975. Filers must complete the information at the top of the form regarding the reporting period and must complete Part I. If filing an amended return, a filer must check the amended return box. Schedule A (Form 8975) must be attached to the Form 8975 for each tax jurisdiction in which the MNE group operates, and a Schedule A (Form 8975) is also required to report “stateless” entities and information, if any. (See below for more information on Schedule A.)

Completing Part II of Form 8975 is optional. Part II is where a filer can enter additional information related to the MNE group, such as a narrative description of the overall business operations and structure of the group or an overall assumption or convention that was used which might have an effect on the report. Any financial amounts entered in Part II must be stated in U.S. dollars. Filers are advised that they aren't limited to the allotted space on the form and can complete as many additional page 2, Part II, sections as is necessary.

The draft instructions state that a separate Schedule A, “Tax Jurisdiction and Constituent Entity Information,” is to be completed for each tax jurisdiction of the MNE group. The Schedule has three parts, the first of which has entries to provide information about the tax jurisdiction to which the schedule pertains (i.e., the jurisdiction itself, and revenues, profits, taxes paid, etc. there), the second of which covers the constituent entity (or entities) in the jurisdiction, and the third of which has space for an filer to provide “any additional information related to the information reported in Part I and II.”
There appears to be an inconsistency in Line 1 of Schedule A (Revenues) and the draft instructions.
 Have an International Tax Problem?  
Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 
 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).
 




















Background. In June of 2016, IRS issued country-by-country (CbC) reporting regs that require certain U.S. business entities that are the ultimate parent entity of a U.S. multinational enterprise (MNE) group with annual revenue for the preceding reporting period of $850 million or more, to file Form 8975 annually with IRS. (Reg. § 1.6038-4; see Weekly Alert ¶  45  07/07/2016) Form 8975 requires the ultimate parent entity of a U.S. MNE group to report information, on a country-by-country basis, related to the group's income and taxes paid, together with certain indicators of the location of the group's economic activity.

The reporting regs apply to “reporting periods” of ultimate parent entities of U.S. MNE groups that begin on or after the first day of the first tax year of the ultimate parent entity that begins on or after June 30, 2016. However, to deal with earlier effective dates in other jurisdictions, IRS has provided a procedure for ultimate parent entities of U.S. MNE groups to file Form 8975 for periods before June 30, 2016. (Rev Proc 2017-23, 2017-7 IRB 915; see Weekly Alert ¶  21  1/26/2017) For this purpose, the reporting period is the period of the ultimate parent entity's applicable financial statement prepared for the 12-month period that ends with or within the ultimate parent entity's tax year; or, if the ultimate parent entity does not prepare an annual applicable financial statement, the 12-month period that ends on the last day of the ultimate parent entity's tax year. (Reg. § 1.6038-4(c))
Draft Form 8975 and Schedule A. The draft Form 8975, Country-by-Country Report, has two parts. The first part has entries to provide information relating to the identification of the filer, such as legal name and employer identification number (EIN), and the second is titled simply “Additional Information” and provides space for a taxpayer to “[e]nter any additional information related to the multinational enterprise group.”
The accompanying draft Schedule A (Form 8975), Tax Jurisdiction and Constituent Entity Information, has three parts. The first has entries to provide information about the tax jurisdiction to which the schedule pertains, the second covers the constituent entity (or entities) in the jurisdiction, and the final has space for an filer to provide “any additional information related to the information reported in Part I and II.”
Draft instructions. The draft instructions provide general information about Form 8975 and Schedule A, including relevant definitions, who must file, and how and where to do so. The instructions also emphasize that records must be maintained to support the information provided on Form 8975 and Schedules A, and that penalties under Code Sec. 6038(b) may apply for failure to report the information required on the form.
The Form 8975 and Schedules A should be attached to the ultimate parent entity's income tax return (e.g., Form 1120, 1065, etc.) and filed with IRS by the due date for that return, including extensions. To request an extension of time to file Form 8975, a filer must follow the instructions for the income tax return to which the Form will be attached. If the income tax return is filed electronically, then the Form 8975 and Schedules A must be attached electronically in the correct format.
The draft instructions also provide specific guidance on filling out the two parts of the Form 8975. Filers must complete the information at the top of the form regarding the reporting period and must complete Part I. If filing an amended return, a filer must check the amended return box. Schedule A (Form 8975) must be attached to the Form 8975 for each tax jurisdiction in which the MNE group operates, and a Schedule A (Form 8975) is also required to report “stateless” entities and information, if any. (See below for more information on Schedule A.)
Completing Part II of Form 8975 is optional. Part II is where a filer can enter additional information related to the MNE group, such as a narrative description of the overall business operations and structure of the group or an overall assumption or convention that was used which might have an effect on the report. Any financial amounts entered in Part II must be stated in U.S. dollars. Filers are advised that they aren't limited to the allotted space on the form and can complete as many additional page 2, Part II, sections as is necessary.
The draft instructions state that a separate Schedule A, “Tax Jurisdiction and Constituent Entity Information,” is to be completed for each tax jurisdiction of the MNE group. The Schedule has three parts, the first of which has entries to provide information about the tax jurisdiction to which the schedule pertains (i.e., the jurisdiction itself, and revenues, profits, taxes paid, etc. there), the second of which covers the constituent entity (or entities) in the jurisdiction, and the third of which has space for an filer to provide “any additional information related to the information reported in Part I and II.”
There appears to be an inconsistency in Line 1 of Schedule A (Revenues) and the draft instructions. Line 1a of Schedule A, Part I, is captioned “unrelated party,” and 1b says “related party.” However, the instructions indicate that 1a is for the aggregate revenues of the constituent entities listed in Part II (listed constituent entities) from transactions with other listed constituent entities, and that 1b is for the aggregate revenues of the listed constituent entities that are generated from transactions with third parties that are not constituent entities in your group.
The draft instructions also provide a number of clarifications, including to what constitutes “revenue,” and how to account for the tax paid, tax expense, and accumulated earnings of listed constituent entities that are “permanent establishments.” The instructions also provide that, for Line 7, number of employees, there are a number of ways to permissibly calculate this figure—i.e., the number as of year-end, the average employment levels for the year, etc.—and that reasonable rounding or approximation is permissible provided that it is consistently applied and doesn't materially distort the relative distribution of employees across various tax jurisdictions.
Part II of Schedule A, constituent entity information, is where filers provide requested information about the constituent entities within the tax jurisdiction. In addition to basic identifying information such as name and address, Line 4a also requests the nature of the main business activity of the constituent entitiy in the relevant tax jurisdiction. More than one Schedule A for the tax jurisdiction in Part I may be needed if the required information in Part II and/or Part III (below) will not fit on a single Schedule A. The draft instructions specify the sections that must be completed for any additional second Schedules A.
Like Form 8975, Part III of Schedule A is where filers can “enter any relevant information or explanation that you deem necessary or that would facilitate the understanding of the information provided in Parts I and II. The information may or may not relate to a specific constituent entity.” The draft instructions provide reference codes that filers can use to indicate if the additional information relates to a specific item in Part I.

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

US Businesses Split on U.S. Border Tax

On February 22, 2017 we posted US Border Tax Runs Into Obstacles where we discussed that U.S. corporations are going to war in Washington over a Republican “border adjustment” tax proposal meant to boost exports over imports, with lawmakers in Congress coming under pressure from some of the nation's biggest employers. The political split that is opening, most pronounced in the narrowly divided Senate, could doom the proposal. If it dies, prospects for a thorough tax code reform, a top 2017 goal for Republicans, would be diminished.

Trump, who has vowed to produce a "phenomenal" tax reform package, without recently offering many specifics, has not taken a clear stand on border adjustment. He spoke favorably about it in a Reuters interview on Thursday.

The main thrust of border adjustment is to exempt companies from having to pay federal income tax on export revenues, while ending the deductibility of import costs from taxable income.
Border adjustment is a core part of a broad tax reform "blueprint" being pushed by House of Representatives Republicans, including House Speaker Paul Ryan and tax panel chairman Kevin Brady. The blueprint has not been put into formal legislation, but border adjustment is already a sticking point.

At least eight Republicans in the Senate have expressed concern about it. Several are from Republican-leaning states where Wal-Mart Stores Inc is a major employer. Wal-Mart is a member of Americans for Affordable Products, a business coalition working against border adjustment. Other members include publicly traded companies such as Best Buy, Costco, Gap Inc, Macy's Inc, Nike Inc and Target .

If the Republican-dominated House approves the blueprint and moves it to the 100 seat Senate, Republicans could lose only a handful of votes and still be able to pass the blueprint.

Have a Tax Problem? 
 


Let US Help!

 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 
 for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact US at
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243).