Tuesday, November 20, 2018

TCJA Divots Golf Corse Expenses and Takes a Bite out of the Meal Deduction.

Taking clients to ballgames? Tax law change makes it costlier.

Businesses, especially smaller firms, may scale back on treating clients to major league baseball games, golf outings and the like after Congress and President Donald Trump ended a tax break for such entertainment.

Tax reform law commonly referred to as H.R. 1 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 has changed the deductibility of certain meals, entertainment and transportation expenses.
  • Prior to 2018, a taxpayer could deduct 50 percent of business meals and entertainment and 100 percent of meals provided through an in-house cafeteria or meals provided for the convenience of the employer (i.e., de minimis fringe benefit).
  • Under the new law, effective January 1, 2018:
    • entertainment is no longer deductible and
    • meals provided through an in-house cafeteria or for the convenience of the employer are subject to the 50 percent limitation.
Maximize tax deductions and save time on tax preparation by setting up separate general ledger accounts for business meals (50 percent deductible), entertainment (nondeductible), and recreational/social employee expenses (100 percent deductible).

The tax overhaul that Trump signed Dec. 22 eliminated a 50 percent deduction for business-related expenses for “entertainment, amusement or recreation.” Suddenly, luxury boxes at stadiums and arenas—along with theater and concert tickets—will be more costly for firms that use them to woo clients.

Businesses that use the entertainment deduction extensively, including law, investment, accounting and lobbying firms, will have to gauge the effects on their bottom lines. Smaller businesses will be less able to absorb the cost.

“I am a long-time, long-suffering season-ticket holder to the New York Jets, so a lot of time, I take clients,” said Charles Capetanakis, a lawyer and CPA at Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP, a mid-sized law firm in New York. Eliminating the deduction “is really going to hurt the small businesses that need to promote their business by entertaining clients.”

The loss of the entertainment deduction is a kind of counterpoint to the Republican Congress’s sweeping tax cuts for businesses. The overhaul slashed the corporate rate to 21 percent from 35 percent. It also created a new 20 percent deduction for many partnerships, limited liability companies, sole proprietorships and other “pass-through” businesses, whose owners pay individual tax rates on the income they earn.

One impact from the loss of the entertainment-expense deduction may be “smaller spends” on professional sports tickets, said Robert Delgado, the principal-in-charge of the compensation and benefits group of the Washington national tax practice at KPMG LLP. But the degree of any reduction “remains to be seen,” said Ed Sturm, a managing director at Deloitte Tax LLP, who heads the tax practice’s meals, travel and entertainment service areas.

“Each company will have to decide for itself whether the higher after-tax cost of these expenses makes good business sense,” Sturm said.

Some have already begun grappling with that decision.

The loss of the entertainment expenses “is painful,” said Washington lobbyist Ryan Ellis, who specializes in tax issues. But there’s still a bright side. Congress didn’t touch another break: Businesses still have a 50 percent deduction for clients’ meals—whether catered or at a restaurant.
Asked how K Street lobbyists in Washington would entertain clients going forward, Ellis said: “At restaurants.”

Planning tip 1 : Maximize tax deductions and save time on tax preparation by setting up separate general ledger accounts for business meals (50 percent deductible), entertainment (nondeductible), and recreational/social employee expenses (100 percent deductible).

The new law addresses transportation two times. It disallows a deduction for the expense of any qualified transportation fringe benefit provided to an employee of the taxpayer. Qualified transportation fringe benefits include transportation in connection with travel between the employee’s residence and place of employment, any transit passes and qualified parking. Qualified parking means parking provided to an employee on or near the business premises of the employer or on or near a mass transit station. The new law later goes on to say no deduction is allowed for any expense incurred for providing any transportation to an employee of the taxpayer in connection with travel between the employee’s residence and place of employment, “except as necessary for ensuring the safety of the employee.” No guidance has been provided to clarify the meaning of this “safety” clause.

Planning tip 2: If an expense is incurred to provide any transportation to an employee in connection with travel between the employee’s residence and place of employment to ensure the safety of employees, document these safety reasons to substantiate your deduction for these expenses.

Need TCJA 2017 Tax Help?
 
We Can Advise on How These Tax Cuts Can Benefit You!
 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.  
 
 

for a FREE Tax Consultation contact us at:
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243




Sources:

TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT

Taxprotoday

2017 TCJA Allows Small Businesses to Expense More

The Internal Revenue Service reminded small business taxpayers in IR-2018-223 that changes to the tax law mean they can immediately expense more of the cost of certain business property. Many are now able to write off most depreciable assets in the year they are placed into service.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), passed in December 2017, made tax law changes that will affect virtually every business and individual in 2018 and the years ahead. Among those for business owners are tax rate changes for pass-through entities, changes to the cash accounting method for some, limits on certain deductions and more.

Section 179 expensing changes

A taxpayer may elect to expense all or part of the cost of any Section 179 property and deduct it in the year the property is placed in service. The new law increased the maximum deduction from $500,000 to $1 million. It also increased the phase-out threshold from $2 million to $2.5 million. These changes apply to property placed in service in taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017. For most businesses, this means the 2018 return they file next year.

Section 179 property includes business equipment and machinery, office equipment, livestock and, if elected, qualified real property. The TCJA also modifies the definition of qualified real property to allow the taxpayer to elect to include certain improvements made to nonresidential real property. See New rules and limitations for depreciation and expensing under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act for more information.

New 100 percent, first-year ‘bonus’ depreciation

The 100 percent depreciation deduction generally applies to depreciable business assets with a recovery period of 20 years or less and certain other property. Machinery, equipment, computers, appliances and furniture generally qualify. The law also allows expensing for certain film, television, and live theatrical productions, and used qualified property with certain restrictions.

The deduction applies to business property acquired after Sept. 27, 2017, and placed in service after Sept. 27, 2017, and before Jan. 1, 2023. In general, the bonus depreciation percentage is reduced for property placed in service after 2022. See the proposed regulations for more details.

Taxpayers may elect out of the additional first-year depreciation for the taxable year the property is placed in service. If the election is made, it applies to all qualified property that is in the same class of property and placed in service by the taxpayer in the same taxable year. The instructions for Form 4562, Depreciation and Amortization, provide details.

Need TCJA 2017 Tax Help?
 
We Can Advise on How These Tax Cuts Can Benefit You!
 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.  
 
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation contact us at:
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243



Settle Your Back Taxes for a Fraction of What You Owe! - OIC

Settle Your Back Taxes for a Fraction of What You Owe - Tax Evaluation Waiting! Stop IRS Collections Now.”
--Google search ad results, September 2018

According to -  what’s true about  the above mentioned search term is that the IRS has a program that allows taxpayers to settle their tax debts for less than the amount they owe. The formal name for this tax debt settlement program is the IRS Offer in Compromise. That brings us to what’s false.

Despite ads that imply the OIC is a common and reasonable solution for many people, the reality is that few people qualify for this program. In fact, while more than 16 million people and 3 million businesses owe the IRS, only 25,000 settled their tax debts using the OIC last year.

The reason is simple: From the IRS perspective, most taxpayers can afford to pay their taxes with their current assets or over time or with a payment plan, so those people wouldn’t qualify for an OIC. Every year, millions of taxpayers pay their taxes on monthly payment plans.
 

The OIC program is geared toward a narrow segment of taxpayers, people who will never be able to pay all of the debt with their future income or assets before the IRS runs out of time to collect it (generally 10 years from the date the tax was assessed). For most people, there are IRS alternatives to the OIC that work out much better for their situation.

Next year, it will be more important than ever for taxpayers to understand their IRS payment options. In 2019, the IRS projects that 3 to 4 million new taxpayers (on top of the 30 million who already file with a balance due) will owe taxes due to tax reform and a growing gig economy. These basics will help taxpayers choose the right option with the IRS.
 
For more information regarding OICs go to -
 
 Have an IRS Tax Problem? 
 
   
Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A. 
 
 
for a FREE Tax HELP contact us at:
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243
 
 


Saturday, November 17, 2018

Pharmacists Writes $5 Million Employment Tax Fraud Prescription Resulting in 41 Months of Jail Time

According to the DOJ a Collinsville, Virginia pharmacist pleaded guilty to failing to account for and pay over employment taxes, announced Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Richard E. Zuckerman of the Justice Department’s Tax Division and U.S. Thomas T. Cullen for the Western District of Virginia.

According to court documents, Jerry R. Harper, Jr., 61, owned and operated Family Discount Pharmacy, Inc. (FDP) in Stanleytown, Virginia, with multiple locations in Stuart, Rocky Mount, Chatham, and Brosville, Virginia.  As owner of FDP, Harper was responsible for collecting and paying over FDP’s employment taxes. 

From 1998 through 2014, FDP Accrued Employment Tax Liabilities of More Than $5 Million.

 
Harper Withheld These Taxes from FDP Employees’ Wages, but Did Not Pay the Taxes to the Internal Revenue Service.
 

In over 15 years, Harper only filed one employment tax return with the IRS.

Harper admitted that instead of providing the employment taxes to the IRS, he caused FDP to pay his personal expenses.  For example, Harper wired over $1 million to his personal bank account, made over $500,000 in stock market investments, spent over $100,000 on his son’s pharmacy school tuition, and purchased over $370,000 of real property in Virginia and North Carolina.  Harper also used part of the money to purchase a Jeep Grand Cherokee and a jet ski.
 

 

“Today’s Guilty Plea Sends a Clear Message That This Type of Conduct Will Not Be Tolerated,”
Said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Zuckerman.

“Employment tax violations represent tens of billions of dollars in lost revenue to the U.S. Treasury and the Justice Department is committed to prosecuting individuals involved in these tax frauds.”
 
On November 16, 2018 He Was Sentenced to 41 Months inPrison for Failing to Account for and Pay over Employment Taxes.

 
In addition to the term of imprisonment, he war ordered to serve 2 years of supervised release and to pay restitution in the amount of $5,069,555.73 and a fine of $25,000.00.
 
 Have a Criminal Tax Problem?
 
 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation contact us at
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243)
 
  



 

Thursday, November 15, 2018

Bank Leumi Hands Over Another US Depositor to the IRS

According to DoJ, Israel Birman pleaded guilty on November 14, 2018 in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California to filing a false federal tax return on which he failed to report interest income he earned from bank accounts at Bank Leumi Le-Israel B.M.
 
According to court documents, between 2006 and 2014, Israel Birman held offshore bank accounts in Israel at Bank Leumi and Israel Discount Bank.  The accounts had balances over $10,000 each year, which required the filing of Reports of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBARs) with the Department of the Treasury.

In 2013, Israel Birman’s bank accounts at Israel Discount Bank had a total value of over $3.4 million. Israel Birman did not file FBARs for 2006-2014. Israel Birman instructed Bank Leumi to hold bank mail from delivery to the United States, and obtained access to his offshore funds through the use of “back-to-back” loans from Bank Leumi USA collateralized by his undeclared Bank Leumi funds.

In 2009 and 2010, Israel Birman earned taxable interest income on his Bank Leumi bank accounts totaling over $187,000. He failed to report that interest income on his 2009 and 2010 federal tax returns.

“The Department Of Justice Continues to Vigorously Investigate and Prosecute Offshore Account Holders
Who Maintain Undeclared Accounts and Willfully Ignore
Their US Reporting and Tax Obligations,”
Said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Zuckerman.
 
In December 2014, Bank Leumi entered into a deferred prosecution agreement after the bank admitted to conspiring from at least 2000 until early 2011 to aid and assist U.S. taxpayers to prepare and present false tax returns by hiding income and assets in offshore bank accounts in Israel and other locations around the world. Under the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Bank Leumi paid the United States a total of $270 million and continues to cooperate with respect to civil and criminal tax investigations.

Sentencing is scheduled for January 28, 2019. Birman faces a maximum sentence of 3 years in prison, as well as a period of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties.

As part of the plea agreement, Israel Birman has agreed to pay a civil penalty of not less than $1,709,883, representing 50% of the balance in his Israel Discount Bank account in 2013.

Do You Have Undeclared Offshore Income?
 
 
Is Your Name Being Handed Over to the IRS?
  
Want to Know Which Remaining OVDP Program is Right for You?
 
 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini& Associates, P.A.  
 
 
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact us at:
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243

 

Tax Returns & 5th Amendment Privilege? - Part I

According to Michael J. DeBlis III, if you’ve ever heard someone “plead the Fifth” on a crime-related television show, you’re aware of the power of the Fifth Amendment. A key part of the United States Constitution, the Fifth Amendment protects Americans from self-incrimination, meaning that if you are arrested for a crime, you are under no obligation to reveal information that may be used against you. While cases of pleading the Fifth are a little less common in real life than they are on Investigation Discovery, the Fifth Amendment does occasionally rear its head for ordinary individuals, particularly where taxes are concerned.

In cases potentially involving the Fifth Amendment, it’s important for taxpayers and attorneys alike to tread carefully. After all, anything you say or do can be held against you, whether you meant to reveal such information or not. As such, taxpayers may find themselves between a rock and a hard place, as the willingly-provided information gathered in an audit – personal information and details about potential wrongdoing that taxpayers would ordinarily never admit to in a court of law, for example – can then be used in a criminal proceeding, like in cases of fraud or tax evasion.
Facing the potential for criminal charges stemming from an IRS investigation is a slippery slope. In order to keep taxpayers as protected as possible in these proceedings, it’s critical to understand policies, procedures, and best practices to reduce the risk of penalty.

The Fifth Amendment and the Filing of Tax Returns

As the adage goes, there are only three absolutes in life birth, death, and taxes and pleading the Fifth isn’t always enough to send the IRS packing.

Under Code Sec. 6012, individuals in the U.S. are required to file annual income tax returns, and also to keep adequate records to support the gross income and expenses included with an annual filing. For those with a penchant for tax fraud, doing as such may seem as though it’s toeing the line of the Fifth Amendment, but the Supreme Court decided this isn’t the case; in United States v. Sullivan, the Court determined that preparing tax returns is not a violation of personal liberties. There may be some case for pleading the Fifth in cases in which the taxpayer is asked to disclose information that is otherwise privileged, but there is no defense for failing to file at all. Returns also cannot be substantially incomplete; they must provide enough information for the IRS to reasonably determine an individual’s tax liability.

If the IRS requests information the taxpayer feels should be privileged, a privilege claim can be made under select circumstances, on a case by case basis. In fact, the Tax Court recently ruled that the privilege against self-incrimination can be used to keep taxpayers from disclosing the source of certain forms of interest income if the return otherwise contains enough information for the IRS to accurately assess the correctness of the overall return.

Invoking the Fifth Amendment

Think invoking the Fifth Amendment may be enough to get the IRS off your case? It may be, but it also may not be.

Section 7602 grants the IRS fairly broad power to compel taxpayers into providing requested information in the course of a return examination. This power is not unlimited, however, and in the right occasion, the Fifth Amendment may indeed provide protection. However, before pleading the Fifth willy-nilly, it’s best to understand its exact role in the Constitution. It reads as follows: “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” In essence, this protects against government abuse, helping to safeguard citizens from having to choose between following the law and self-incrimination or perjury.

These privileges don’t just stop at criminal cases, however; civil proceedings are also included. This means that taxpayers are indeed permitted to plead the Fifth in proceedings with the IRS, assuming there is a valid reason to do so. If a taxpayer is found to be “faced with hazards of self-incrimination that are real and appreciable, not merely imaginary and unsubstantial” the request will be upheld.
For those potentially facing IRS sanctions or penalties, it’s only natural to ask, “why not invoke the Fifth Amendment at all times when dealing with the IRS?” After all, confessing to tax fraud or other challenges that the IRS may investigate would be self-incrimination, would it not? This is certainly a valid question, but it’s also one that may stand in the way of resolving complex tax situations, particularly for those with an educated appointed representative, like a tax accountant or lawyer. With a qualified representative speaking on behalf of a taxpayer, it’s unlikely that a case will evolve into one in which pleading the Fifth becomes essential, even in cases concerning fraud or other potentially criminal charges. It is also important to understand the rights of a taxpayer and his representative; when asked, the IRS must produce a copy of their administrative file under code section 7803. Generally, reviewing files and workplaces indicates that pleading the Fifth isn’t necessary. However, if the IRS refuses to give up files based on the perceived influence to proper tax administration, the taxpayer may want to proceed with as many privileges invoked as possible.

In addition to the above, the burden of proving privilege falls on the one asserting privilege, which means that the taxpayer must be able to demonstrate why he is claiming privilege – and saying “because” isn’t a good reason at all. From there, it is up to the court to decide whether this choice is valid, and if it’s deemed to be unnecessary, the ability to plead the Fifth is essentially voided.
While the IRS occasionally issues threats, it’s highly unlikely that the results of an investigation will actually yield prosecution, making the need to invoke the Fifth essentially moot. Further, invoking the Fifth immediately colors the way a taxpayer looks to the IRS. Even if there’s nothing criminal to hide, simply bringing up privilege will lead to a presumption that there is. Doing this unnecessarily can send the IRS digging deeper than previously intended, and may also significantly delay the examination process and send legal costs soaring.

Have a Criminal Tax Problem?
 
 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation contact us at
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888 882-9243)