Friday, March 19, 2021

IRS Resumes Delinquent Debt Passport Certification For Passport Revocation or Non-Renewal


On the IRS Operations During COVID-19: Mission-critical functions continue (rev. 3/15/2021), the IRS has said that it 
is resuming programming for notifying the State Department of taxpayers certified as owing seriously delinquent tax debt following the temporary suspension of certain collection activities with the March 25, 2020, People First Initiative announcement in response to COVID-19. 

Beginning The Week Of March 14, Affected Taxpayers Will Receive Notices And Are Encouraged To Pay What They Owe Or Enter Into A Payment Agreement With The IRS
To Avoid Putting Their Passports In Jeopardy.

Affected taxpayers generally owe the IRS more than $54,000 in back taxes, penalties and interest for which the IRS has filed a Notice of Federal Tax Lien and the period to challenge it has expired, or the IRS has issued a levy. As of December 2020, taxpayers previously certified owe on average more than $200,000 in outstanding tax debt, often extending back more than 6 years. The great majority of these are pre-pandemic liabilities and are considered a priority for the IRS due to the amount owed and length of time the taxpayers have been delinquent without working with the IRS to resolve their debts. Per the law, the State Department generally will not renew their passport or issue a new passport after receiving this certification from the IRS, and in some cases may revoke the passport. 

IRS offers a number of programs to help taxpayers meet their tax obligations including payment agreements, Offers in Compromise, and, if the IRS determines a taxpayer cannot pay any of their tax debt, a temporary delay of the collection process. When the tax liability is paid in full, the taxpayer has been found to be currently not collectible, or the taxpayer has entered into an installment agreement or has a pending Offer in Compromise, the tax debt is no longer considered to be seriously delinquent and the certification to the State Department is reversed. 

Taxpayers Who Have Already Taken Significant Steps
To Resolve Their Debt

Can Still Resolve Their Passport Issues By Contacting
 TAS, Who Can Request Manual Decertification.
The memo tells TAS employees to elevate a case to the employee's Local Taxpayer Advocate (LTA) if the case meets all the following criteria. The taxpayer has 1) Imminent foreign travel plans, lives abroad, or has another compelling need for the passport 2)A significant risk of being certified before TAS will be able to help resolve the taxpayer's debt; and 3) Taken demonstrable recent steps to get into compliance with the IRS that nevertheless fall short of the statutory and discretionary exclusions.  

Then IRM 13.1.24.8.5.3, Decertify the Debt with the Department of State, is superseded and replaced with the following: 
  1. Once the taxpayer meets a criterion for decertification under IRM 5.19.1.5.19.9, Reversal of Certification, review IRM 13.1.24.8.8 to determine if the account will require manual decertification. If so, send an OAR to the SB/SE Passport Office seeking manual decertification.
  2. If the taxpayer has an imminent need for a passport as defined in IRM 5.19.1.5.19.9.1, Expedited Decertification, gather the supporting documentation described. If the IRS function that resolved the debt did not complete and sign page one of Form 14794, Expedited Passport Decertification, prepare the form for LTA signature on page one.
  3. Send an expedited OAR to *SBSE Passport Group mailbox, requesting that the taxpayer be decertified within one business day. Include the signed Form 14794 and the required documentation. If the OAR is not complied with timely, or if you disagree with the response, immediately elevate the case to your LTA for issuance of a TAO.
  4.  
    If You Face This Problem, You Should Consult with Experienced Tax Attorneys, As There Are Several Ways Taxpayers Can Avoid Having the IRS Request That the State Department Revoke Your Passport. 
  Want To Keep Your US Passport?
 
 
Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.
 
for a FREE Tax Consultation Contact us at:
or Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888)882-9243.
                 
 


Wednesday, March 17, 2021

IRS to Delay Tax 4/15 Deadline to Mid-May During Pandemic

Here's news that my accountant friends will be happy to hear: according to Bloomberg the Internal Revenue Service is planning to delay the April 15 tax filing deadline by about one month, giving taxpayers additional time to file returns and pay any outstanding levies, according to three people familiar with the discussions.

The IRS is still figuring out what the final deadline will be. The agency is considering setting the filing deadline either on May 15 or May 17, according to two of the people, who were not authorized to speak publicly because the decision had not been finalized. May 15 is a Saturday and the IRS typically delays filing deadlines that fall on a weekend or holiday to the next business day.

The filing extension would give taxpayers additional breathing room to meet their tax obligations in what is becoming one of the most complicated tax seasons in decades. The change would come after calls from accountants and leaders in Congress to delay the due date as new legislation and pandemic-related work changes disrupt taxpayer plans.

Among the changes this tax season are last-minute amendments to the $1.9 trillion stimulus bill signed into law earlier this month that give filers a new tax exemption on up to $10,200 of jobless benefits. The individual tax return, Form 1040, is also the mechanism for people to claim any missing $1,200 or $600 stimulus payments from last year.

Besides the disruptions from the pandemic, the changes in tax law will mean some filers will have to wait for updated forms, resubmit their returns, and some will need to consult a tax adviser on how to proceed if they’ve already filed.

The tax extension also comes as the IRS has been handed another big task: processing a third round of direct payments to households, this time for $1,400 each. The IRS said it has so far sent about 90 million payments totaling $242 billion.

Have IRS Tax Problems?


     Contact the Tax Lawyers at

Marini & Associates, P.A. 

for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243) 



IRS Has New Mail Backlog Due to Winter Storms

An IRS official speaking at a Federal Bar Association virtual meeting on March 3, 2021 said that three of the IRS’s service centers are facing new mail backlogs due to winter storms and quarterly return filings. The official, De Lon Harris, deputy commissioner for examinations, Small Business/Self-Employed Division, couldn’t estimate how long it would take the IRS to process its incoming mail. 

According to Harris, the IRS is processing payments received immediately. The IRS’s top priority for submissions to process are 2020 tax returns claiming refunds, he said.

However, Harris also said that the IRS’s Austin, TX, Kansas City, MO, and Ogden, UT service centers are a couple of weeks behind in opening mail due to a combination of closures due to the winter storms (Austin) and taxpayers filing quarterly business returns that were due at the end of January (Kansas City and Ogden). The fourth service center, in Fresno, CA, is opening mail the same day it’s received, Harris said.  

When asked about the processing of net operating loss (NOL) carryback claims, which are supposed to be processed within 90 days, Harris noted that the COVID-19 pandemic is continuing to cause processing delays, “but we no longer have these semi-truck trailers sitting at the campuses full of mail like we did several months ago.”

The IRS likely received more NOL carryback claims than usual in 2020 because the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act (PL 116-136; March 27, 2020) allows business with NOLs incurred in 2018, 2019 or 2020, to carry back those NOLs five years so they can get a refund of previously paid taxes.

Have an IRS Tax Problem?


                                                                Contact the Tax Lawyers at
Marini & Associates, P.A. 

for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243) 



Source  

Thomson Reuters

Monday, March 15, 2021

Taxpayers Cannot Void Their FBAR Settlement


According to Law360, A married couple lost their attempt to reverse a $511,000 OVDP settlement agreement they made with the IRS that had settled their failure to report their Swiss bank account holdings when a D.C. federal judge ruled they had entered into it voluntarily. 

Robert Harrison and Julianne Sprinkle could not show that they signed their agreement under duress, the court said Thursday, dismissing the case. If they thought their case required judicial review, they should have paid the penalty and pursued the administrative process of seeking a refund, according to the court.

Harrison and Sprinkle took advantage of the Internal Revenue Service's Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program in 2018 to resolve their failure to file Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts for an unreported Swiss bank account worth up to $1.2 million, the judge said. The OVDP program involves a 27.5% penalty on the highest balance in an undeclared foreign account in exchange for lower civil penalties and possible amnesty from criminal prosecution.

The couple tried to switch to another amnesty program, Streamlined Domestic Procedures, which has a 5% penalty. but the IRS rejected their petition. The couple thus had to choose between the OVDP or going to court and risking a higher penalty. They chose the OVDP and paid $511,000 in penalties and interest in 2018. As part of their settlement, they waived the right to pursue an administrative remedy with the IRS, according to the opinion.

Two years later, the pair tried to nullify the settlement. They claimed they took the OVDP offer under duress, given their fear of a potential penalty should they go to court. 

They also argued the IRS violated the Administrative Procedure Act and due process by failing to provide guidance on the criteria used to switch to the streamlined program.

The court rejected the couple's arguments. Suing under the APA is proper only when there are no forms of adequate remedy, the court said. Harrison and Sprinkle had an opportunity to pursue their damages by paying their penalty and pursing a tax refund suit against the IRS. They did not, the court pointed out.

The government afforded the couple an opportunity for judicial due process, but they chose to settle their dispute through the OVDP, which included an agreement not to take that route, the court added.

The couple's duress claim fails as well, according to the court. The IRS did not threaten them with a particular action, and the steep penalty they might have faced in losing a court action resulted from an act of Congress, not the IRS, the ruling said.

Have IRS Tax Problems?


     Contact the Tax Lawyers at

Marini & Associates, P.A. 

for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243) 



Friday, March 12, 2021

IRS Allows Electronic Signatures On Various Non-E-Fileable Forms Until June 30, 2021

In a memo to all IRS employees, the IRS says it is implementing a temporary deviation from its regular procedures that will allow electronic or digital signatures on various forms that currently require handwritten signatures, i.e., that are not e-fileable. The decision was made due to taxpayer representatives' concerns about securing handwritten signatures during the coronavirus pandemic.

The memo notes that electronic and digital signatures may be created by many different technologies. No specific technology is required for this purpose during this temporary deviation.

The memo is effective for the forms listed below, that are signed and postmarked from January 1, 2021, through June 30, 2021.

The forms are:

  • Form 3115, Application for Change in Accounting Method;
  • Form 8832, Entity Classification Election;
  • Form 8802, Application for U.S. Residency Certification;
  • Form 1066, U.S. Income Tax Return for Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit;
  • Form 706, U.S. Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return;
  • Form 706-NA, U.S. Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return;
  • Form 709, U.S. Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return;
  • Form 1120-ND, Return for Nuclear Decommissioning Funds and Certain Related Persons;
  • Form 1120-RIC, U.S. Income Tax Return for Regulated Investment Companies;
  • Form 1120-C, U.S. Income Tax Return for Cooperative Associations;
  • Form 1120-REIT, U.S. Income Tax Return for Real Estate Investment Trusts;
  • Form 1120-L, U.S. Life Insurance Company Income Tax Return;
  • Form 1120-PC, U.S. Property and Casualty Insurance Company Income Tax Return;
  • Form 1128, Application to Adopt, Change or Retain a Tax Year;
  • Form 3520, Annual Return To Report Transactions With Foreign Trusts and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts;
  • Form 3520-A, Annual Information Return of Foreign Trust With a U.S. Owner;
  • Form 8453 series, Form 8878 series, and Form 8879 series regarding IRS e-file Signature Authorization Forms; and
  • Form 8038, Information Return for Tax-Exempt Private Activity Bond Issues; Form 8038-G, Information Return for Tax-Exempt Governmental Obligations; and Form 8038-GC, Information Return for Small Tax-Exempt Governmental Bond Issues, Leases, and Installment Sales.

This is effective for the forms listed above, that is in them postmarked from January 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021.

The IRS previously allowed electronic or digital signatures for a smaller group of forms through December 31, 2020. 

Have IRS Tax Problems?


     Contact the Tax Lawyers at

Marini & Associates, P.A. 

for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243) 


Zurich’s Oldest Private Bank Admits To Helping U.S. Taxpayers Hide Offshore Accounts From IRS

On March 11, 2021 the DoJ announced the filing of a criminal Information against RAHN+BODMER CO. (“R+B”), a financial institution located in Zurich, Switzerland. The Information charges R+B with one count of conspiring to help U.S. accountholders evade their U.S. tax obligations, file false federal tax returns, and otherwise defraud the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) by hiding hundreds of millions of dollars in offshore bank accounts at R+B. 

They also announced a deferred prosecution agreement with R+B (the “Agreement”), under which R+B admits to its unlawful conduct in assisting U.S. accountholders in violating their legal duties. R+B’s admissions are contained in a detailed Statement of Facts attached to the Agreement. 

The Agreement Requires R+B To Provide Ongoing Assistance To The Department of Justice And To Pay A Total of $22 Million In Restitution, Forfeiture, And Penalties.

If R+B abides by all of the terms of the Agreement, the Government will defer prosecution on the Information for three years and then seek to dismiss the charge. 

Rahn+Bodmer now admits, it aided U.S. taxpayers in evading their tax responsibilities to the tune of more than $16 million. 

This venerated banking institution knowingly offered banking services that assisted its U.S. customers in evading their tax obligations, and affirmatively schemed to conceal from the IRS the assets and income of U.S. accountholders. 

Now Rahn+Bodmer Will Pay $22 Million
and Commit To Helping The Justice Department
 Uncover Tax Evasion By U.S. Customers.”

Through a years-long scheme, the R+B bank hid the assets of U.S. accountholders to shield them from their tax obligations. Today’s admission and agreement provide a clear path to recovery of funds owed to the U.S. government, and sends a strong signal that offshore accounts are not beyond the reach of special agents with IRS CI.” 

From at least in or about 2004 and continuing until at least in or about 2012, R+B conspired with certain of its U.S. accountholders and others to defraud the United States with respect to taxes, file false federal tax returns, and commit tax evasion. 

R+B’s bankers assisted U.S. accountholders in concealing their ownership and control of assets and funds held in undeclared R+B accounts, which enabled those U.S. accountholders to evade their U.S. tax obligations. R+B admitted to holding undeclared accounts on behalf of approximately 340 U.S. taxpayers, who collectively evaded approximately $16.4 million in U.S. taxes between in or about 2004 and in or about 2012. 

The assets under management that R+B held for undeclared U.S. accountholders increased from approximately $391 million in 2004 to approximately $550 million in 2007, its peak year for undeclared assets under management. In furtherance of the scheme to help U.S. taxpayers hide assets from the IRS and evade taxes, R+B undertook the following actions, among others: R+B opened “numbered” or “pseudonym” accounts for U.S. accountholders in order to reduce the risk that U.S. tax authorities would learn their identities. 

R+B opened and maintained accounts for U.S. accountholders in the names of non-U.S. corporations, foundations, trusts, or other legal entities, thereby helping U.S. taxpayers conceal their beneficial ownership of the accounts. 

R+B agreed to hold bank statements and other account-related mail in Switzerland, rather than send them to the U.S. accountholders in the United States, which helped ensure that documents reflecting the existence of the accounts remained outside the United States and beyond the reach of U.S. tax authorities. 

After Liechtenstein and the United States signed a Tax Information Exchange Treaty in December 2008, R+B transferred the undeclared assets of certain U.S. taxpayers from accounts held in the names of sham foundations organized under the laws of Liechtenstein to new accounts held in the names of new sham foundations organized under the laws of Panama, in an effort to further conceal the accounts from U.S. tax authorities. 

R+B allowed U.S. accountholders and third-party asset managers to make withdrawals by check from undeclared accounts in amounts of less than $10,000, in an apparent attempt to conceal transactions from U.S. authorities. 

On occasion, R+B opened accounts for U.S. taxpayers who were exiting UBS AG and other Swiss banks, and allowed these U.S. taxpayers to continue to conceal their undeclared assets at R+B. 

R+B additionally opened “escrow” accounts on behalf of a Swiss attorney to facilitate the transfer of undeclared assets of U.S. accountholders that had been converted to gold and other precious metals held in a vault at UBS. 

R+B helped U.S. accountholders to repatriate funds to the United States in a manner designed to ensure that U.S. tax authorities did not discover the undeclared accounts, including by transferring the funds of one U.S. accountholder in increments of approximately $100,000 to another Swiss bank before the U.S. accountholder routed the funds to a diamond dealer in Manhattan, where the U.S. accountholder ultimately received them.

R+B, through its bankers, made regular visits to the United States to solicit, open, and service undeclared accounts of U.S taxpayers. Under today’s resolution, R+B is required to cooperate fully with the Department of Justice and affirmatively disclose new information it may later uncover regarding U.S.-related accounts. 

R+B is also required to disclose information consistent with the Department’s Swiss Bank Program relating to accounts closed between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2019. 

Do You Have Undeclared Income from one of 
these Offshore Banks or 
Financial Advisors?
Is Your Name Being Handed Over to the IRS?
  
Want to Know if the OVDP Program is Right for You? 

Contact the Tax Lawyers at 
Marini & Associates, P.A.   

for a FREE Tax Consultation contact us at:
Toll Free at 888-8TaxAid (888) 882-9243