Tuesday, March 31, 2026

BVI Beneficial Ownership Rules Just Changed: What Offshore Entity Owners Need to Know Before April 1, 2026

Starting April 1, 2026, the British Virgin Islands is opening the door for third parties to access beneficial ownership information on BVI entities. Recent amendments to the BVI Beneficial Ownership regime introduce new procedures for requesting and challenging disclosure of that information. If you own or control a BVI business company or limited partnership, these changes demand your attention now.

Who Can Request Your Information

Under the amended framework, any person who can demonstrate a "legitimate interest" may apply to the BVI Registrar of Corporate Affairs to inspect or obtain a copy of information recorded in the Register of Beneficial Owners (ROBO). A legitimate interest generally means the request is connected to investigating, preventing, or detecting money laundering, terrorist financing, or proliferation financing. Persons who carry out customer due diligence obligations under BVI law also qualify.

The information subject to disclosure is limited to individuals who directly or indirectly hold a 25% or greater ownership interest—or exercise equivalent control—over a BVI entity. What can be disclosed includes the beneficial owner's full legal name, month and year of birth, nationality, and the nature of their interest or control. Each request is subject to a non-refundable government fee of US$75.

How to Apply for an Exemption from Disclosure

Beneficial owners can apply for a general exemption from disclosure at any time after entity incorporation. Applications may be filed directly or through a legal representative. To succeed, the applicant must provide a clear explanation of the circumstances justifying the exemption, along with supporting evidence. Grounds for exemption include situations where disclosure may expose the beneficial owner—or persons connected to them—to a risk of harm or vulnerability, or where the beneficial owner is a minor or otherwise lacks legal capacity.

Supporting documentation will depend on the circumstances but may include proof of age, official government correspondence involving national security concerns, or affidavits evidencing reasonable belief and identifying individuals at risk. The Registrar reviews each application individually and may grant exemptions subject to conditions or for a specified duration. If the underlying circumstances change, the beneficial owner must notify the Registrar.

A key advantage of a general exemption is that, once granted, it can apply across multiple entities owned by the same beneficial owner.

How to Object to a Specific Disclosure Request

When the Registrar receives a request and is satisfied there is no good reason to refuse it, the Registrar will notify the legal entity through its Registered Agent. The legal entity then has five days from receipt of notice to file a notice of objection. That objection must clearly explain why the Registrar should not grant access.

The Registrar's notice will include the purpose for which the information will be used. If the requesting party is a legal entity, the notice will also identify the name of that entity.

If a timely notice of objection is filed, the legal entity has an additional five days to submit a formal application opposing disclosure. Acceptable grounds include that the request was not made for a proper purpose, contains misleading or inaccurate information, is likely to cause risk of harm to the beneficial owner, or involves a beneficial owner who is a minor or lacks legal capacity. Supporting evidence is required. If the Registrar rejects the application, the applicant has a right to appeal.

Unlike a general exemption, an objection is time-sensitive and applies only to the specific entity named in the request.

Exemption vs. Objection: Know the Difference

The two mechanisms serve different purposes and have different strategic implications. A general exemption can be filed proactively at any time and covers multiple entities. An objection is reactive, time-limited, and entity-specific. Importantly, neither mechanism restricts access by competent authorities or law enforcement.

Given the tight timelines involved—particularly the five-day windows for objections—beneficial owners of BVI entities should not wait until a disclosure request arrives to consider their options. Proactive planning, including evaluating whether to seek a general exemption now, is the best way to protect your interests.

What You Should Do Now

If you own or control a BVI entity, consult with qualified legal counsel to assess whether a general exemption application is appropriate for your circumstances. Ensure your Registered Agent is prepared to notify you immediately if a disclosure request is received so you can act within the required deadlines. The cost of being unprepared—given the five-day response windows—is far greater than the cost of planning ahead.

 Have An International or Tax Problem?


     Contact the Tax Lawyers at

Marini & Associates, P.A. 


for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)

Monday, March 30, 2026

Clock Beats Commissioner: IRS Loses $70M Easement Case on Late FPA Under BBA

The Tax Court allowed Olivian Holdings LLC to keep its full $70 million 2018 conservation easement deduction and avoid roughly $26 million of tax and all penalties, solely because the IRS issued the final partnership adjustment (FPA) too late under IRC Section 6235.

What the Tax Court Did

·         The court entered a stipulated decision on March 27, 2026, granting Olivian its entire $70 million charitable contribution deduction for a Louisiana conservation easement for 2018.

·         As part of that decision, Olivian owes no related tax underpayment (about $26 million) and no accuracy-related or civil fraud penalties for that year.

·         The parties agreed that the IRS’s concession was based “solely” on the fact that the August 3, 2023 FPA was not timely under IRC Section 6235.

Statute of Limitations Issue

·         The notice at issue was a final partnership adjustment, which is how the IRS communicates adjustments to partnership items under the BBA regime.

·         Olivian argued that the IRS failed to issue the FPA within the applicable limitations period or obtain a valid extension.

·         By February 20, in its summary judgment motion, Olivian pointed out that the IRS had effectively stopped arguing timeliness and instead tried to rely on the fraud exception to keep the statute of limitations open.

·         On March 24, counsel for both sides signed a stipulation allowing the court to enter decision in Olivian’s favor based on the late notice.

IRS Fraud Allegations That Went Nowhere

·         In earlier filings, the IRS alleged Olivian was part of a fraudulent syndicated easement shelter selling inflated deductions based on overstated appraisals.

·         The IRS said managers knew of at least two lower appraisals, yet claimed an almost $700,000 per‑acre value for about 170 acres by positing infeasible clay mining, even though the land had been valued at under $3,000 per acre only 2.5 years earlier.

·         The IRS asserted that the managers never intended to operate a clay mine and instead used the property purely to market pre‑packaged, overstated tax deductions.

·         Despite these allegations, the court never reached the merits; the procedural defect (untimely FPA) controlled the outcome.

Parallel Agate Holdings Decision

·         Earlier that same week, in a separate stipulated decision, the IRS also conceded a different 2018 Louisiana conservation easement deduction — about $48 million claimed by Agate Holdings LLC.

·         In Agate, the IRS again lost all tax and penalties because the FPA notice was not timely under IRC Section 6235, amid allegations the Service had backdated extension documents to get around the statute.

·         Together, Olivian and Agate underscore that, even in aggressive syndicated easement cases with asserted fraud, strict adherence to the BBA statute of limitations for FPAs can be outcome‑determinative.

Practitioner takeaway

·         Treat 6235 like a hard stop. In BBA partnership exams, even in “bad facts” syndicated easement cases with strong fraud narratives, an untimely FPA is fatal to tax and penalties; Olivian and Agate show the court will not rescue the IRS from a blown 6235 deadline.

·         Build a statute dossier early: calendar the base 3‑year period, track every Form 872 / Form 8984 or equivalent extension, and document when any modification requests were made and when they were fully “submitted” (which drives the 270‑day rule under 6235(a)(2)).

·         Do not concede fraud‑exception arguments casually: force the IRS to prove that a valid fraud theory actually keeps the BBA assessment period open, rather than assuming fraud “automatically” rescues a late FPA.

·         In any easement BBA case, make statute of limitations and notice validity a first‑tier issue alongside valuation and 170 compliance; as Olivian and Agate illustrate, clean procedural wins can obviate having to litigate abusive‑scheme allegations.


 Have A Tax Problem?


     Contact the Tax Lawyers at

Marini & Associates, P.A. 


for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)





Sources:

   1.       https://www.law360.com/tax-authority/federal/articles/2458796/-70m-easement-tax-break-sticks-after-irs-concedes-lateness           

2.      https://law.justia.com/codes/us/2015/title-26/subtitle-f/chapter-63/subchapter-c/sec.-6235/  

3.      https://www.law360.com/tax-authority/articles/2458796  

4.      https://www.thetaxadviser.com/issues/2025/oct/final-partnership-adjustment-not-issued-timely/   

5.       https://natlawreview.com/article/clock-beats-commissioner-irs-concedes-48m-easement-case  

6.      https://www.currentfederaltaxdevelopments.com/blog/2026/3/25/statute-of-limitations-backdated-extensions-and-the-fraud-exception-in-agate-holdings-llc-v-commissioner  

7.       https://www.linkedin.com/posts/polsinelli_a-major-conservation-easement-case-just-delivered-activity-7443311322068389888-beDF

8.      https://www.currentfederaltaxdevelopments.com/blog/2026/3/9/statute-of-limitations-and-notice-requirements-under-the-bba-centralized-partnership-audit-regime-an-analysis-of-mammoth-cave-property-llc-v-commissioner

9.      https://www.facebook.com/groups/1880812852184422/posts/2980562382209458/

10.   https://citysecretary2.dallascityhall.com/pdf/AA's/2022/05 - MAY 2022 REVISED.pdf

11.    https://readthereporter.com/DailyEdition/2021-12-13-Weekly.pdf

12.   http://weblink.arroyogrande.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=304450&dbid=0&repo=ArroyoGrande

13.   https://www.law360.com/tax-authority/federal/articles/2415943/11th-circ-urged-to-restore-cut-to-17m-easement-deduction

14.   https://dekalbschoolsga.blob.core.windows.net/wpcontent/2023/11/ics-2024-min.pdf

15.    https://irvingtx.gov/index.php?section=boards-appointments-committee

hi

International Trust Planning for Global Families

International trust planning has become a central focus for advisors as globally connected families navigate an increasingly complex cross-border environment. Citizenship, residency, business interests, and beneficiaries often span multiple jurisdictions, each with its own tax, legal, and regulatory considerations. As a result, families and advisors must consider how both domestic and foreign trusts are structured not only to achieve planning objectives, but also to function reliably across borders over time.

At Marini & Associates, PA, based in Miami, Florida, we work with global families and their advisors to design trust solutions that can withstand changing laws, shifting residency, and evolving family dynamics across multiple countries.

Why Cross-Border Trust Issues Are Increasing

As global families’ personal, financial, and geographic ties become more interconnected, cross-border considerations now arise in even routine trust discussions. Common scenarios include:

·         Families with both U.S. and non-U.S. beneficiaries

·         Pre-immigration, expatriation, and mobility-driven planning

·         Offshore assets held alongside U.S. investment portfolios

·         Multigenerational families with members and business interests in multiple jurisdictions

These fact patterns drive demand for flexible trust solutions that can adapt as family members move, tax rules evolve, and reporting regimes expand.

Foreign Grantor Trusts: A Key International Tool

One structure frequently used in international planning is the Foreign Grantor Trust (FGT). For U.S. tax purposes, a trust’s classification as “foreign” depends on the IRS court test and control test; failure of either can cause the trust to be treated as a non‑U.S. entity for tax purposes. Through careful drafting, a South Dakota or Florida Foreign Grantor Trust can be established as a “foreign” trust for U.S. tax purposes, effectively mirroring offshore tax treatment while remaining a U.S. trust from a legal and administrative standpoint.

This distinction is especially important for:

·         Foreign-born individuals residing in the U.S.

·         Non‑U.S. persons holding U.S. assets or investing into the U.S.

·         Families addressing repatriation, reporting, privacy, or estate tax exposure

Because the trust is considered a U.S. trust for legal purposes, families can also access modern trust features, including long-term (dynasty) planning, strong asset protection statutes, and robust privacy laws available in top domestic jurisdictions. Long-term success, however, requires more than thoughtful drafting; maintaining intended FGT status depends on disciplined fiduciary processes, consistent administration, and a clear understanding of both U.S. tax rules and the governing trust law.

Integrating Domestic and Offshore Asset Protection

International families often feel forced to choose between domestic and offshore asset protection structures. In practice, many of the most resilient strategies deliberately incorporate elements of both. Leading U.S. jurisdictions with progressive trust statutes, such as South Dakota, offer stable trust governance, experienced fiduciary oversight, and industry-leading asset protection regimes that can be paired with offshore features when appropriate.

By integrating domestic and offshore protection concepts into a unified trust instrument, advisors can help families:

·         Retain U.S.-based administration, governance, and transparency

·         Access offshore-style protections only when circumstances warrant

·         Preserve flexibility as legal, tax, and enforcement environments change

For international families navigating heightened transparency, evolving reporting regimes, and cross-border enforcement, an integrated domestic–offshore strategy can help balance flexibility, control, and long-term reliability.

How Our Firm Can Help

Every global family’s profile is unique, and the “right” trust structure depends on goals, existing asset mix, jurisdictions involved, and family governance priorities. At Marini & Associates, PA, based in Miami, Florida, we regularly advise on:

·         International trust design and review

·         Use of Foreign Grantor Trusts and other cross-border structures

·         Coordination with foreign advisors on tax and reporting issues

·         Asset protection planning across domestic and offshore jurisdictions

We collaborate closely with clients’ existing legal, tax, and investment teams to implement structures that are not only technically sound today but also designed to remain workable over time.

If your family has ties to multiple countries or if you are considering holding U.S. and non‑U.S. assets in trust, we invite you to schedule a confidential consultation to discuss your options. 

Pre-Immigration Tax Planning Is Needed
To Avoid These US Tax Traps For The Unwary!


   Contact the Tax Lawyers at

Marini & Associates, P.A. 


for a FREE Tax HELP Contact us at:
www.TaxAid.com or www.OVDPLaw.com
or 
Toll Free at 888 8TAXAID (888-882-9243)





Sources:

1.       https://bridgefordadvisors.com/international-trust-planning-for-global-families/ 

2.      https://www.tridenttrust.com/knowledge/insights/advisors-guide-how-south-dakota-trusts-fit-into-international-estate-planning      

3.      https://bridgefordglobal.com/services/foreign-grantor-trust/  

4.      https://bridgefordtrust.com/south-dakota-foreign-grantor-trust/ 

5.       https://bridgefordtrust.com/services/foreign-grantor-trust/ 

6.      https://sdtrustco.com/why-south-dakota/asset-protection/ 

7.       https://bridgefordtrust.com/domestic-offshore-asset-protection/   

8.      https://www.stuartgreenlaw.com/the-south-dakota-trust-advantage

9.      https://macpas.com/asset-protection-trust-planning/

10.   https://bridgefordtrust.com

11.    https://www.cassonestatelaw.com/south-dakota-asset-protection-trusts

12.   https://wealthadvisorstrust.com/blog/foreign-grantor-trusts-south-dakota-trust-law/

13.   https://bridgefordglobal.com/bridgeford-trust-company/

14.   https://internationalfamilytrust.com/foreign-grantor-trust/

15.    https://internationalfamilytrust.com/why-south-dakota/unique-south-dakota-laws/